Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Romania "could recognize Kosovo" - PM


Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta has told the Pristina-based Klan Kosova television outlet that his country "could recognize Kosovo."
Source: Tanjug
(Beta/AP, file)
(Beta/AP, file)
Ethnic Albanians in Serbia's southern province in early 2008 unilaterally declared independence, but Serbia rejected the proclamation as a violation of its territorial integrity and Constitution.
Romania is one of five EU member-states that have not recognized Kosovo.

"In 2008 Romania decided not to recognize Kosovo. However, things have changed since then. Governments have changed and some new decision on the recognition of Kosovo could be made," Ponta said after a summit of heads of state of Southeastern Europe - according to Albanian language Pristina-based daily Epoka E Re.

The media in Kosovo are reporting that Ponta said his country would consider recognizing Kosovo "because many things have changed in Kosovo since 2008."

According to the paper, he "stressed that one of the main reasons is that Kosovo and Serbia are successfully conducting their dialogue."

Rama: "We intend self-determination in the territory of our nation between Albanians in the European Union, but not The Greater Albania"

Update.........



 

 

Rama: Tirana wants the same rights for Albanians in Preshevo, as have Serbs living in Mitrovitsa"

Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic comes in Tirana with high security measures

Rama for Greece: "We do not negotiate the national interest for the sea with Greece ,,, but do not want to close our eyes to such problems that affect our national security."

Vucic: We have different opinions, Serbia considered Kosovo and Metohija as part of Serbia, while Albania considers as an independent country"




VUCICI
 

Edi Rama, Parallels Autonomy of Srpska Mitrovista the Albanians of Preshevo

During the press conferece Rama - Vucic, Prime Minister's Albanians Rama, made it clear that: "Tirana wants the same rights for Albanians in Preshevo, have today Serbs living in Mitrovitsa"


Vucic: We have different opinions, Serbia considered Kosovo and Metohija as part of Serbia, while Albania considers as an independent "

Rama asked from journalist of Top Channel TV, for worsening relationship with Greece and Turkey, while regulating the relationship with Serbia was, he replied: 

Rama asked for worsening relationship with Greece and Turkey, while regulating the relationship with Serbia was, he replied:

Rama: "To share the attitudes Kosovo absolutely unacceptable .."

Rama: The position of Serbs in Albania is an example and have the same rights that have minorities in Albania, almost spectacular best .. "

Rama 'For Greece have underscored bilateral interactions strategic and have no kind of problem with Athens, I invited Alexis Tsipras in Tirana, and I do not see any extraneous reasons neither Athens nor other circles wonder why the Albanian state, asks the Greek authorities, international law for research information in the sea, and that is not our secret attempt to find common ground to solve an issue of interest of tow countryes.

Rama: "We do not negotiate the national interest for the sea with Greece ,,, but do not want to close our eyes to such problems that affect our national security."

For the selection of Shpetim Idrizi (Cham community) as deputy of Parlamenit Albania, ... is our interior problem not for others, .  


Journalist: do you accept the idea of Greater Albania?

Rama,,, we have made strong dialogue for the region. Great Albania is not a project, but peace in the Balkans, could be put in danger by a football match.

Greater Albania, I said, Great Albania is an idea, which they promoted and feed those who do not want the Albanians Irene.

"We intend self-determination of our nation surfaces between Albanians in the European Union, but not Greater Albania " 

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Metropolitan Andreas of Konitsas : "Wake up! I`ts the times that the Northern Epirus and our country, is in great alert.! "






The Metropolitan Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa, Andreas once again expresses its deep concern over what is happening with regard to Albania and the new open longer anti-Greek stance towards Greece, with the creation of new issues that did not exist anymore as that of land borders.

Bishop Andreas in his open letter to the Greek state, calls for regarding all the latest developments in Greek-Albanian relations, developments that inevitably affect the Ethnic Minority in Northern Epirus.

The Bishop also mentioned the claims of Chams while sounding the alarm to Athens for the 'black clouds' coming regarding Northern Epirus calling controllers and "responsible" to awaken finally.

Read the open letter of the Bishop:

His Eminence Metropolitan Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa Mr. ANDREAS,

made the following statements:

            "I have often pointed out, that Albanians worn with impudence and insolence towards to Greece. And this proves successive events involving the Greek national community of Northern Epirus.




Albania raises border issue with Greece and plans to create ...the  "Greater Albania".

 And forgets that the current borders in the south at least, comes from the theft of Greek territory of Northern Epirus with the help mainly of Italy in 1914.


            One more recent samples of the Albanian ingratitude, but also anti-Greek policy is that the Socialist Party of Prime Minister Edi Rama put in place third vice Albanian Parliament in Spetim Idriz, who is Chairman of the Nationalist Party of Chams.



       However, developments in the neighbor are rapid, the Greek Government monitors awkward movements of Albanians, and risks of Northern Community in particular, by criminals 'Chams', which the Albanians obvious now incite anti-Greek sentiments.

            Expressing once again our concerns, we pray and while crying to the government and citizens around the world: Gentlemen, wake up! The country and the Northern Epirus risk the End Times. Why, if we continue to indifferent, we will pay dearly one - God forbid - a national humiliation and destruction. "

Defencenet.gr news section


US Naval Forces to Acquire Over 300 Ships in Five Years – Navy Secretary

US Navy Ships in Indian Ocean

© Flickr/ Official US Navy Page/SPC Mark Alvarez
US
 
The United States will build a fleet of more than 300 vessels by the end of the decade, US Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said. He pointed out that in 2001 the US Navy comprised 316 vessels, but by 2008 the number had dropped to 278.
 
The US Navy will number more than 300 ships by 2020 with 60 percent of them in the Pacific Ocean, US Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said.

"We are building the fleet above 300 ships. We’ll get there by the end of the decade. We’re shifting at least 60 percent to the Pacific," he said during a MSNBC show answering the question on how the US will keep competitive with the Chinese Navy.

Mabus pointed out that in 2001 the US Navy comprised 316 vessels, but by 2008 the number had dropped to 278.

According to the secretary, from 2005 to 2009 the US put under contract 27 ships, and in the following five years – over 70 ships.

Vajgl: Jihad and Greater Albania behind the conflict in Kumanovo


Published:
SOURCE Tanjug, Vecernje Novosti, Vecernji List

ZAGREB/SKOPJE – Situation in Macedonia is very serious and, after armed conflict in Kumanovo, European institutions have realized it, said an envoy of European Parliament Ivo Vajgl, not excluding the possibility that it was a clash of radical Islamists, but also fighters for a “Greater Albania”, reported “Vecernje Novosti”.
Photo from: Novosti.rs
Photo from: Novosti.rs
Vajgl, who is one of three mediators in negotiations with Macedonian leaders VMRO-DPMNE Nikola Gruevski and opposition leader Zoran Zaev on overcoming the months-long political crisis, says that problems in Macedonia are multilayer.
“We have a post-transition situation in which the main principal is how to grab as much of the state property of the former Yugoslavia as possible, and the level of corruption is high. Inside the ethnic groups there are interests that are largely influenced from outside,” said Vajgl in an interview with Zagreb’s “Vecernji List”.
Asked whether he speaks about Albania, Vajgl said:”I think of the Albanians in whom it is difficult to determine who represents authentic Albanian political and social structure, and who can be directed into the framework of the idea of which no one wants to speak about, but it is there. The idea of a ‘Greater Albania'”.
He recalled that the Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama threatens Macedonia with veto on NATO membership.
The situation, says Vajgl, is complicated and that is why the incident in Kumanovo can be explained only by an independent investigation.
He noted, however, that there are a lot of indications for an assumption that clashes in Kumanovo have links to radical Islamism.
“Some of those people who participated in clashes in Kumanovo in – obviously – very professional terrorist action, fought in Syria and Iraq. They know with what idea they came to Kumanovo. And it is jihad and spreading radical Islam to the European continent. There may be other motives – a Greater Albania or connection to domestic political scene, although it is difficult to believe that anyone is willing to take responsibility for the deaths of eight police officers,” he said.
It seems, he says, that because of Kumanovo European institutions realized that the situation is extremely dangerous, that it can be manipulated from outside and that it can turn into a regional conflict.
“I have never excluded it and I believe that the guarantee for the stability of the region is only a membership in the EU and probably NATO although I have reservations about NATO as a global policeman,” he said.
To the remark that he is not referring to Macedonia as a former Yugoslav Republic, Vajgl says that it is “absurd denomination”.
“By that logic I could say that I come from former Yugoslav republic Slovenia or the former Austro-Hungarian province of Kranjska. It is completely absurd and irrational that Greece, who is asking us for support and understanding, shows so little solidarity for neighbors and lack of understanding for the fact that non-recognition of Macedonia creates a focal point of the crisis on their borders,” said Vajgl.
According to him, the name dispute is a bilateral dispute, as well as the demarcation of Croatia and Slovenia, which Slovenia used to block Croatia.
“I’ve never been in favor of having former Yugoslav republic blackamiling each other. My attitude was, both as the Minister of Foreign Affairs and President of the Board for Foreign Affairs, to have states resolve their conflicts before entering the EU, because these issues in some cases become weapons of nationalists. I already see on the horizon the following disputes: Croatia and Serbia, Croatia and BiH, BiH and Montenegro,” said Vajgl.

Albania's president warns that Macedonia crisis could be a setback for region's EU ambitions


  • Albania Balkan Cooperation-1.jpg
    Albanian President Bujar Nishani, left, meets with visiting Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta in Tirana, Tuesday May 26, 2015, during the South East European Cooperation Process summit, a regional grouping of 13 Balkan and eastern European countries. (AP Photo/Hektor Pustina) (The Associated Press)
Albania's president says the crisis in Macedonia could be a setback for the Balkan region's efforts to add new members to the European Union.
President Bujar Nishani told regional leaders meeting in Tirana that the Macedonia crisis showed the "fragility of stability in the region."
Macedonia is grappling with a political crisis triggered by wiretapping allegations against the government, while tension has been stoked by a shootout this month between police and suspected ethnic Albanian militants that left 18 dead.
The leaders were meeting as part of the 13-nation South-East European Cooperation Process. Five of its members are in the EU, while five others are candidates.

Albania hosts regional European summit

Albania hosts regional European summit

Albania hands over South-East European Cooperation Process presidency to Bulgaria

World Bulletin / News Desk

EU memberships for Balkan countries can play a role in uniting them around common goals despite their historical and cultural differences, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan said Tuesday.
Babacan made the remarks in the Albanian capital Tirana where Albania handed over its presidency of the South-East European Cooperation Process (SEECP) to Bulgaria.
"The EU membership process of Balkan countries is very important for Turkey. We believe that the EU (memberships) could play a role in bringing these countries together around common goals and ideals despite any historical issues or cultural differences they may have," he told reporters.
About the South-East European Cooperation Process, he said that it served a significant role in developing cooperation and dialogue between Balkan countries, adding that it "creates an opportunity to further improve political relations in particular, and unite countries around common areas of interest, values and ideals despite differences."
The Turkish deputy premier also highlighted the importance of facilitating trade among Balkan countries as increased free circulation of goods, people and capital would have positive consequences.
"If we can establish a common ground and a strong economic cooperation, and countries become more dependent on each other economically, this would be very helpful both for security and stability," he added.
Babacan was joined by Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev, Moldovan President Nicolae Timofti and Romanian Prime Minister Victor-Viorel Ponta at the SEECP event.
Albanian President Bujar Nishani said that the country during its SEECP presidency fought organized crime, championed regional peace and made efforts for EU membership for non-EU countries.
The SEECP was established in 1996 in Bulgaria to establish peace and stability in the Balkans.
Turkey has been a SEECP member since its founding and held the presidency in 1998-1999 and 2009-2010.

Russia Gives Up on Mistral Deal


Published:
SOURCE TASS
KAZAN – Following the failed deal on the supplies to Russia of French Mistral-class helicopter carries, Russia plans building its own carriers, but of a different class and there is no aim of copying the French analogues, a senior military industrial official said on Tuesday.
Photo: Reuters/Stephane Mahe
Photo: Reuters/Stephane Mahe
“We have such vessels in our plans, but they will be built in line with a different class as we have a different ideology of paratroopers landing. There is no set task of copying Mistrals,” Russian Government’s Military Industrial Commission Deputy Chairman Oleg Bochkaryov told journalists, TASS reports.
Bochkaryov added that Russia was not discussing with France the supplies of the promised vessels and the only issue currently at talks with French partners was the compensation for the severed contract.
“Russia will not take them, it is a matter of fact, and there is only one discussion currently underway and it concerns the sum of the compensation, which Russia should be reimbursed with,” he said.
Earlier in the day, Russian Security Council’s Deputy Secretary Yevgeny Lukyanov said that the country’s defense capabilities would be no way affected by France’s failure to supply Mistral helicopter carriers under a bilateral deal.
According to assessments of the French weekly Le Point, annulment of the deal to supply Mistrals to Russia may cost France from €2 billion to €5 billion.

Vucic and Rama expected to discuss relations, infrastructure


Aleksandar Vucic will be visiting Tirana on Wednesday and Thursday while his talks with Albanian PM Edi Rama will be under special scrutiny of the world public.
Source: B92
The press conference in Belgrade during Rama's visit (Tanjug, file)
The press conference in Belgrade during Rama's visit (Tanjug, file)
The first visit of a Serbian prime minister to Albania comes amid "a new crisis in the Balkans," but also six months after the exchange of strong words between Vucic and Rama during the latter's visit to Belgrade.
The global media at the time reported about "the fragile relations between the two countries and the tense atmosphere at the prime ministers' press conference," describing the visit as "a missed opportunity." However, both sides are now coming out with much softer tones.

Speaking for TV B92 Vucic said that there "there are no heavy messages from Belgrade," while Rama said that Serbia and Albania "should be in the Balkans what France and Germany were in Europe."

Serbian, Albanian and foreign analysts think the visit is very important for the region, while Secretary General of the Regional Cooperation Council Goran Svilanovic said that in addition to establishing better relations, Vucic wants to talk about "everything that divides us currently."

"There are topics that simply must be talked about and on which they will not agree even after they have talked once, and two times, and three times. But as long as they talk, it is important to understand that this is a good thing," said Svilanovic, to Deutsche Welle.

AFP in the past days pointed out that the aim of the visit is to "repair the fragile relations between the two Balkan countries," mentioning also economic topics.

These could be the key topics on the table when Vucic and Rama meet.

Belgrade-based daily Danas states that the talks will be above all about the building of "the Nis-Pristina highway to a port in Albania," as well as "the reconstruction of the railroad through Kosovo to Albania."

According to the findings of this paper, infrastructure projects will be among the most important topics, while Traffic, Construction and Infrastructure Minister and Deputy PM Zoran Mihajlovic confirmed she would be in Vucic's delegation.

Mihajlovic in February announced the launch of the railroad projects and the highway, while a map of reconstruction of the road and rail corridors Serbia-Montenegro-Albania Vucic was presented by Vucic in August 2014 to German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

"When one road should start from Albania to Europe, it passes through Serbia, and when Serbia wants to demonstrate that it is a factor of stability, then it certainly develops infrastructure projects throughout the region," the minister said and reminded that there is already a joint working group on infrastructure projects.

The media in Tirana have similar findings, and the 24 Ore website states that Albania and Serbia have a key role in maintaining peace and stability in the Balkans and that they are "geo-strategically very important countries."

"In light of such a geopolitical situation indicative for the trend of relations between the two countries will be whether or not the joint projects that were talked about in August in Berlin will soon be presented," writes this website.

Albanian Ambassador to Belgrade Ilir Boca said he believed that "the main topics will be common strategic projects in the areas of infrastructure and energy, which would be partly funded from the EU."

"Strategic investments might lead us further on the path to stability and security and draw closer to Europe. That's what Vucic and Rama spoke about also in Brussels," he said.

Albanian media point out that Kosovo is not "the only bone of contention" between the two countries, but also "the controversial position of Serbia toward NATO and European politics and sanctions against Russia."

"We hope that we will have fewer of those topics and that we will pay more attention to the common interest of developing of our countries and the entire region," said Bocka.

Greece Optimistic About Deal, U.S. Intervene in Negotiations with IMF

tsipras-2



by Philip Chrysopoulos - May 26, 2015


tsipras-2Greek government officials appeared optimistic on Monday night that an agreement with creditors is possible within the next ten days, while the U.S. allegedly intervene in negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Greek government spokesperson Gavriil Sakellaridis said he believes a deal could be reached “soon.” The deal would have to be secured in the coming days so it can go through Parliament and gain approval for the release of further financial aid.

However, international creditors insist that a deal is not as close as Athens believes. Deliberations between the Brussels Group and the Greek team resumed on Tuesday, May 26, with IMF’s Olivier Blanchard saying on Monday that Greece’s budget proposals are not “credible” and very far from achieving the targeted primary surplus.

There are still four points in which both sides do not appear to agree, namely budgetary issues, pension and labor law reforms, and value added tax rates, with labor and pension reforms being the so-called “red lines” the Greek government has pledged not to cross.

Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras met on Monday with government Vice President Yiannis Dragasakis, Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, Economy, Infrastructure, Shipping and Tourism Minister George Stathakis and Alternate Minister for International Economic Relations Euclid Tsakalotos. The Greek PM stressed the need to expedite negotiations on a technical level so that Athens secures an emergency Eurogroup on June 2.

U.S. intervene to influence IMF to expedite an agreement with Greece

According to Greek newspaper “Ta Nea,” Tsipras has spoken to U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew about convincing the IMF to be more lenient in negotiations over the Greek debt.

The U.S. official assured the Greek PM that the U.S. would make the necessary moves to unlock the impasse in negotiations, according to the report.

It is reported that the U.S. Secretary will bring up the Greek issue during the upcoming G7 meeting that is scheduled to begin on Wednesday in Germany. The telephone contact between Tsipras and Lew was publicized by the U.S. Treasury and later confirmed by the Greek government.

According to the report, Lew appears to have been convinced of the need to push forward for an agreement. It is further reported that U.S. Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary for Europe and Eurasia Daleep Singh said  Washington will do what it can so that the IMF does not block an agreement.
- See more at: http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/05/26/greece-optimistic-about-deal-u-s-intervene-in-negotiations-with-imf/#sthash.kAnFgR7a.dpuf

'Something Needs to Give': Macedonian Leaders Meet Over Political Crisis

Macedonia protest

© AP Photo
Europe
Get short URL
Anti-Government Protests in Macedonia (30)
056225
There is increasing speculation over the political future of Macedonia and its Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski, as the country’s four main political party leaders meet for EU-US brokered talks in Skopje to try and break the impasse that has resulted in calls for Gruevski to resign.
In the third round of talks between Macedonian leaders, Gruevski will join main opposition chief Zoran Zaev, head of the junior ruling coalition party, Ali Ahmeti and Menduh Thaci, leader of the country’s ethnic Albanian party, to discuss what actions to take over the country’s volatile political situation.
There have been calls for Gruevski to resign from his position following ongoing criticism from political opponents.
These protests culminated in tens of thousands of people taking to the streets of the country’s capital of Skopje earlier this month to protest against the prime minister, who is alleged to be involved in the widespread surveillance of over 20,000 people.
Based on recorded conversations, which were released by opposition leader Zoran Zaev, the Gruevski government has been accused of spying on large parts of the Macedonian population, instigating electoral fraud and even covering up the killing of a young man by a police officer.
However Gruevski has hit back at the claims, saying the recordings had been tampered with as part of an attempt by foreign intelligence agencies to undermine his government and destabilize the country.
'Don’t Hold Breath for Progress' — Analyst
However despite the recent pressure on the government and marathon talks between the PM and Zaev in Strasbourg last week, Gruevski has refused to step down.
Dr James Ker-Lindsay, researcher in Balkan studies at the London School of Economics (LSE) told Sputnik he doesn’t believe the talks will achieve anything significant, if anything at all.
"I don’t think anyone is holding their breath for any progress, which is a great shame. There’s no doubt that something needs to give in the country. This is not a healthy situation at the moment. It’s highly damaging on all sorts of levels."
Dr Ker-Lindsay said he didn’t believe Gruevski would stand down from his position, but was hopeful some progress on reforms to the country’s electoral voting system would be made and proposals for greater transparency for the media would be established.
Concern Over US-EU Influence
The talks are to be overseen by US ambassador Jess Baily and EU representative Aivo Orav, which has also sparked concern from some about the potential impact that outside influences may have had on the recent Macedonian protests.
Some, including Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov have suggested the recent political discontent has been being stoked by Western actors as part of a wider geopolitical game, aimed at destabilizing the country, and subsequently scuppering any plans for Russia's Turkish stream gas line to pass through Macedonia.
"There are attempts to pressure Gruevski's government for refusing to join in on sanctions against Russia and for backing the Turkish Stream [gas] pipeline [construction]," he said.
"The Macedonian events are quite brutal and are being orchestrated from outside."
These concerns were heightened following reports that Western-backed activist groups were offering Macedonian students $1,500 come up with their best protest ideas against Gruevski’s government.
Despite these claims, James Ker-Lindsay disagrees the West is playing a destabilizing role in the country for geopolitical reasons.
"I certainly don’t see any reason for that [West stirring protests]. The fact of the matter is that the EU and NATO have invested a lot of time into trying to stabilize the Balkans and it just wouldn’t make sense to suppose that they’re going to act as some sort of destabilizing factor, partly because you just don’t know what the spin-off outcomes of that might be," he said.
"Political instability is not good, it raises the possibility – however small – of ethnic instability creeping in and nobody wants to see that happen."
West 'Arm-Twisting' Over Reforms
However, Dr Ker-Lindsay also told Sputnik that the West would certainly be acting to push the country further towards EU and NATO membership.
He pointed out that joining the groups was still part of official Macedonian government policy, but the recent Gruevski government — which has seen plans to join both the EU and NATO hindered by Greek a veto – has moved away from reforms required to by Brussels to join the bloc.
"I think what we’re seeing now is quite interesting, because we’ve got Gruevski, who came to power as a reformer and was very dynamic and very forward-thinking, but because Greece blocked EU accession talks and Greece has stood in the way of NATO accession, over the past few years, he has become more and more comfortable and he’s not had to make any of these reforms for the EU. So he’s been able to hide behind this Greece veto and strengthen his position," he said.
"So what we’ve seen sadly is Gruevski, who started off as a reformer, as a positive figure, is now turning against EU and NATO membership. However this does still remain official government policy. So any form of arm-twisting that is coming in from the West is urging Macedonia to keep making reforms. However, now I think we are facing up to the fact that there’s a discrepancy between official rhetoric and official action."

Monday, May 25, 2015

President warns of danger posed by "Greater Albania" plans


The latest terrorist attacks in the region "confirm fears that creators of the so-called Greater Albania are not resting," Tomislav Nikolic has said.
Source: Beta
(Tanjug, file)
(Tanjug, file)
"The terrorist attacks, as well as deliberate provocations during the visit of the Tirana delegation (to Serbia) are a signal that the entire region at risk," the Serbian president told Italy's Ansa news agency ahead of the visit of his Italian counterpart.
"I think this problem should be jointly opposed by all countries that have a significant Albanian population, which is a prerequisite for the planned territorial unification of Albanian territories," Nikolic stated.

According to him, the plan to create "a Greater Albania" dates back to 1878 and "the military-political association for the defense of the rights of the Albanian people," that sought to create "an integrated territory in the territories of Serbia, Macedonia, Greece and Montenegro."

"The methods to achieve this idea have been thoroughly prepared and are being carried out through terrorist actions, and it is very important that the international community recognizes them as such," said the Serbian president.

Serbia has "a crystal clear foreign policy orientation," he also said - and that is the priority of joining the European Union, "as confirmed by our deeds."

"At the same time, Serbia is a sovereign country that does not forget its history and must not forget the current economic interests. Today we do not participate in the formulation of foreign policy positions of the European Union. I think that explains it all, so it is unnatural to expect that we will automatically and technically fall in line behind the decisions in the making of which we do not participate," " Nikolic said when asked about "relations with Russia, to which Belgrade did not impose sanctions when the EU did."

The president added that Serbia is fully committed to its European path and has done a lot to make sure the provisions of the Brussels agreement with Pristina are implemented on the ground.

"However, the (Kosovo) Albanian side for its part has not made the slightest sign of good will. We expect European officials to make additional efforts so that the Albanians fulfull what they have signed to normalize the lives of all citizens who live in the province, regardless of their nationality. The life of Serbs in the province is extremely difficult and complicated, equality and life in freedom are far from their reality," Nikolic said.

He added that Serbia "owes a debt of gratitude to the Italian KFOR troops" for their efforts to save the population and the Serb holy places from total destruction.

Nikolic added that relations between Serbia and Italy two are very good, "but there is always room to build new ones and improve the existing." The president stressed the importance of Italy's continuous political support when it comes to giving Serbia a date to open its accession negotiations with the European Union.

Albanian PM "wants to deepen collaboration" with Serbia


"We want to deepen collaboration with Serbia and advance together on the path of peace, cooperation and integration in the EU," says Albanian PM Edi Rama.
Source: B92, AFP, Tanjug
(Tanjug, file)
(Tanjug, file)
He spoke for AFP ahead of Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic's visit to Tirana this week, the first ever of a Serbian prime minister.
Vucic will "have talks with his counterpart on Wednesday and will be speaking Thursday at an economic forum in which regional country leaders are participating," the French agency reported, noting that Rama six months ago visited Belgrade as the first Albanian prime minister in 68 years.

AFP said that "relations between Serbians and Albanians are strained over the question of Kosovo," describing it as "a territory with an ethnic Albanian majority that declared independence from Serbia in 2008, with the support of the United States, but remains unrecognized by Belgrade and its ally Russia, as well as others."

According to announcements, Vucic and Rama will have a meeting, followed by that of the two delegations, while the prime minister will later hold a press conference.

According to the Albanian ATA agency, the Vienna Economic Forum on Thursday will gather "prime minister from several Adriatic and Black Sea countries."

In an interview for B92 late on Sunday, Vucic said that Albania and Albanians are "in expansion, both economic and political," and that Serbia should maintain good relations and attempt to have as much investments as possible in that country, "and a trade surplus."

On May 21 Vucic said that he was optimistic ahead of his trip to Albania and that he would go there to build good relations and discuss "all the things that currently divide us that can be bridged so that the differences are not so great."

Sunday, May 24, 2015

The two Balkan nationalism

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_8XyXbHWItaGgn4w1toPPLhQY4N_9SpG-PhxLIWM4LJThzmFToEKWb5KLAC1j74IPCXD-bnraIeq8OFqHWyEMo8OZj0EF6ud-uzLIu4_qS8yjvu6h9nR_Y3d0Rv0gdjUusACkdsdRbsce/s1600/melbourneskopjanirredentistclaims.jpg
The Greek response to the Albanian nationalism will be the official claim of the autonomy of Northern Epirus in Albania, based on the Protocol of Corfu 1914.

The only proposal that arises from history and common sense is to support methodically the Greek national interests


The Balkan unrest should concern us alongside the critical negotiations with our lenders. Skopje convulsed by conflict Slavs police with armed Albanians and the revelation that the Gruevski government watched rival phones. In Albania the socialist Prime Minister Edi Rama made statements in favor of "Greater Albania", denies the Greek EEZ Ionian and supports Chams anti-Greeks in the upcoming municipal elections in his country.

Some of our compatriots tend to choose through the media of supposedly moderate politicians in neighboring countries. We heard festivals in the election of Rama arguing that supposedly is more European and more modest than the right rival Sali Berisha. Yet for premiership Rama became official doctrine the "Greater Albania". Moreover, he as leader of the opposition had appealed to the Constitutional Court -with Turkish parakinisi- against the agreement of Athens - Tirana for determining maritime zones.

Other voices propose to tolerate the Macedonian nationalism as a counterweight to the Albanian. The only proposal that arises from history and common sense is to support methodically the Greek national interests and against the two nationalisms, Albanian and pseudo "makedoniko" must to stop illusions that such and such politician is more cooperative. Albanians and Skopjans do their job and we should do ours.

On the issue of Skopje have to come back to our original position, not bestowing the name Macedonia or as complex or as derivative and therefore reject any geographical definition. To immediately terminate the Interim Accord of September 1995, which, having ripped from FYROM, it was used by the legal base to implicate us before the International Court of Law. Also we are concerned formally the fate of Greek minority living oppressed in that State.

If he wants the Albanian ethnic community in FYROM to continue the armed struggle against the Slavs and secede, let's let them do it. I repeat: The dismantling of Skopje will mean removing an anti-Greek nationalism in the Balkans. The argument that so encouraged Albanians will answer that Albanian nationalism reared the US decision and our European partners to spin off Kosovo from Serbia. Neither then nor now they asked us we can prevent -and we have no reason to make- dissolving Skopian arrangement.

The Greek response to the Albanian nationalism will be the official claim of the autonomy of Northern Epirus in Albania, based on the Protocol of Corfu 1914.

Constantine Cholevas
"Democratia" Newspaper

http://www.dimokratianews.gr/content/44672/oi-dyo-valkanikoi-ethnikismoi

The Problems Foreign Powers Find in the Balkans

Text Size

Summary

Russia, Turkey and the West all share one rival in the Balkans: political instability. Located at the confluence of three historic empires, the strip of land between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea has long been the focus of competition among global powers. Now it is just one arena in the standoff between Russia and the West. Yet, with both sides attempting to buy influence with investments and energy projects, and with Turkey struggling to keep pace, internal political challenges threaten to undermine outside efforts to develop and shape the region. As major powers use their financial and political clout to gain influence in the Balkans, weak local governments will continue to balance among competing nations.

Analysis

Regional and world powers have paid an inordinate amount of attention to Balkan countries lately. On May 15, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov visited Serbia, just a few days after the Chair of the Russian Federation Council, Valentina Matviyenko, met with Serbian leaders in Belgrade. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will visit Bosnia-Herzegovina on May 20 — Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu and Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan have paid similar visits in the past month. Western leaders have also demonstrated an interest in the region, with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond visiting Bulgaria in January, while high-ranking U.S. officials regularly visit Romania.

Strategic Investments From the West

Western governments have two major goals in the Balkans: to maintain stability in the western part of the region and to minimize Russian influence. To that end, the United States and the European Union have been involved in the internal politics of the Balkans since NATO committed troops in the aftermath of the Bosnian war and the conflict in Kosovo in the 1990s. Western troops continue to serve in Kosovo in a peacekeeping capacity. The European Union has used considerable amounts of resources and political capital to bring reform and economic development to the region, but with mixed results.
The West has the advantage of access to ample development and defense funds that can be divided out among countries hungry for economic growth. Countries such as Serbia and Macedonia are unlikely to join the European Union in the next decade; they are held back by internal divisions and face resistance from current EU members. Yet they still have access to the economic benefits that come from close ties with Europe. Between 2014 and 2020, the European Union plans to grant 1.5 billion euros (around $1.7 billion) to Serbia, a prospective EU member, and 11.4 billion euros to Bulgaria, a current EU member. (Bulgarian citizens benefit from the ability to travel freely and work in the European Union.) In addition, there is significant defense assistance coming into Bulgaria as part of an effort to strengthen NATO members along the Russian borderlands.
The Ukraine crisis galvanized the United States into boosting defenses along NATO's eastern edge. NATO has enlarged its multinational response force, created a new spearhead force that can mobilize quickly and established a chain of outposts in the eastern Balkans called force integration units, which could serve as command centers during a conflict.
At the same time, fighting in Ukraine prompted the European Union to prioritize its Southern Corridor natural gas project, which would bypass Russian energy giant Gazprom in the European energy market and reduce Europe's reliance on Russia. In addition, the West strongly discouraged Bulgaria from participating in Russia's South Stream project. When Bulgaria opted out, Russia canceled the project in December.

Russia Counters the West

For its part, Russia has used its influence in the Balkans, where it has close historical and cultural ties with countries such as Serbia and Greece, to threaten Western interests. However, the Kremlin's interest in the region in the past year stems in large part from its deteriorating relationship with the West. Russia's goal in the Balkans is to prevent the expansion of Western troops and military infrastructure in the region while maintaining sufficient strength to implement strategic energy infrastructure projects.
Although the West has greater resources to invest in the Balkans, Russia owns several regional energy assets and holds a number of outstanding loans to Balkan governments. Moscow has managed to retain good diplomatic relationships with some local oligarchs, especially in Bulgaria. In 2008, Gazprom bought a majority stake in Serbian oil firm NIS. Like the European Union, Russia has provided funding to Serbia — about $1.5 billion in over the past two years. The Kremlin also sealed energy and loan deals with the Republika Srpska, the ethnic Serb entity in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Western pressure may have ended the South Stream project, but the pipeline Russia plans to build in its place, Turkish Stream, could help Gazprom counter European energy diversification efforts. The pipeline would bring natural gas across the Black Sea to the Turkey-Greek border. To help Gazprom reach Central European markets, Russia has advocated the construction of a pipeline that would run from Greece to Macedonia, Serbia and Hungary. In addition to Turkey, these four countries are at the center of a Russian diplomatic offensive. Nevertheless, with Russia struggling to manage internal financial and political challenges, its leverage in the Balkans is relatively limited.

Turkish Interests

Turkey has its own cultural links and economic interests in the Balkans, but it currently lacks the resources and military power to rival Russia or the West.
One of Turkey's strategic objectives is to maintain influence in the Black Sea. Historically, Ankara has achieved this by anchoring itself on the Danube. By extension, this objective entails managing relations with other Black Sea states in the Balkans. But Turkey is also attempting to grow closer to Bosnia-Herzegovina, where Ankara means to enhance its influence through cultural and historical ties. These connections are important: Muslim Bosniaks started migrating to Turkey in the 17th century, and a few million Turkish citizens claim Bosniak roots today. This ethnic affinity has prompted popular government initiatives to invest in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Turkey cannot match the level of financial investment Western powers and Russia commit to the Balkans. But as the gatekeeper to the Black Sea and as a NATO member, Turkey plays a significant role in Bulgarian and Romanian efforts to boost defense cooperation in response to the crisis in Ukraine. Moreover, Turkey has been able to use financial and political tools to curry favor with Bosnia. Turkey is among the top five investors in the country. In fact, Turkish officials claim that Turkey has invested $1.1 billion in Bosnia since 1995 — a significant sum for a country with a gross domestic product of about $18 billion.  
The Turkish Stream pipeline, if built, would no doubt empower Turkey. Ankara would play a central role in its construction, and it would use that role to improve its relationships with countries that would receive Turkish Stream natural gas, including Macedonia and Serbia.

Violence in Macedonia

Despite the attention they command from larger powers, the Balkans are often unstable, and their instability can impede the influence of foreign powers. For example, deadly violence erupted in Macedonia on May 9, when Interior Ministry personnel cracked down on alleged ethnic Albanian militants in Kumanovo, culminating in the death of eight police officers and 14 alleged militants. Nearly 40 policemen were injured and 30 militants were arrested. There are also unconfirmed reports of civilian casualties.
The Macedonian government argued that its operation in the town was to prevent militants from carrying out planned terror attacks inside the country. However, the timing of the operation led many to believe the crackdown was politically motivated — a distraction that could divert attention from a recently discovered illegal government wiretapping program.
The bloodshed in Kumanovo, coupled with revelations of the illegal acquisition of information of citizens, further undermines the credibility of a government that is already distrusted by its people. On May 17, tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Macedonia's capital city, Skopje. Western-sponsored talks the following day failed to bring about a compromise between the government and opposition parties, and the government's hold on power remains tenuous.
Russia is counting on running its extension of Turkish Stream through Macedonia into Central Europe, but the country's instability threatens to derail these plans at a time when countries along alternative routes are not receptive to Russian proposals. The incumbent Bulgarian government, under pressure from the United States and the European Union, is opposed to participation in a Russia-led energy project, while Albania retains a pro-Western foreign policy orientation.
With so much at stake, the Russian Foreign Ministry came out forcefully in support of the Macedonian government in response to the protests. The ministry criticized opposition parties and non-governmental groups alike, accusing them of being in league with Western powers and choosing to follow a chaotic "color revolution" ideology. Macedonia's incumbent government is nominally in favor of NATO and EU accession but has been open to Russia's Turkish Stream proposals. A weak government, as well as growing instability in Macedonia, is preventing the country from becoming a staunch Western ally or a reliable partner for Russia.

A Broader Regional Challenge

Clashes in Macedonia raise the specter of renewed ethnic tension and violence in the Balkans, where political borders do not coincide with ethnic boundaries. Though recent violence probably will not spill over into nearby countries in the immediate future, Macedonia's problems are a concern in the region. Serbia raised its combat alert status, and Bulgaria sent troops to reinforce the border.
Since 1999, Western governments have worked to stabilize Kosovo and the surrounding area through the presence of peacekeepers and large-scale development programs. Brussels is also pressuring Serbia to normalize relations with Kosovo as a precondition for EU accession. A potential increase in militancy along the Kosovo-Macedonia border would threaten this stability and undermine the West's long-standing efforts in the region.
Ultimately, no matter how much time and external political power is invested in the Balkans, success depends on the presence of strong, stable governance. But Balkan governments are notoriously weak. In Bulgaria, social unrest in 2013 forced the government to resign. Since then, the country has gone through several weak, short-lived governments that have been beset by internal disputes. Meanwhile in Bosnia-Herzegovina, political paralysis has prevented the introduction of much-needed economic and political reform. Protests over corruption in 2014 highlighted the Bosnian political system's inability to address the country's inherent problems.
The tumult of Balkan politics enables foreign powers to make certain inroads, boosting their influence through financial and political support for local governments. But the fragility of Balkan states prevents them from swinging decisively toward one outside power. Like other nations in Europe's borderlands, many of the Balkan countries have attempted to retain a degree of neutrality. A balancing strategy means that Balkan governments can access advantageous economic agreements, financial assistance packages and political support from multiple external powers.
Geopolitical rivalries and local disputes in the region have historically formed an explosive combination, fueling military conflicts like World War I as well as numerous Balkan armed struggles. Today, a more nuanced competition is taking place as foreign powers use economic influence, defense cooperation, and political support to further their goals in the region.
The conflict in Macedonia — and the potential it has to upset Russia's plans in the region — embodies the problems foreign powers find in the Balkans. While the West, Russia and Turkey are all eager to pump capital into the region for their own betterment, weak governments will continue balancing among outside powers.

Serbian President: ‘Greater Albania’ project danger for entire region


Published:
Author: InSerbia Team
BELGRADE – Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic condemned the creation of the so-called Greater Albania, saying that the project is a real danger for peace and stability of the entire Balkan region and specifically stressing – “no” to Kosovo’s independence and “yes” to continuation of dialogue with Pristina.
Tomislav-Nikolic14
Belgrade wants to continue the EU-brokered dialogue with Pristina in order to finally resolve concrete problems the people are facing and contribute to full reconciliation and peaceful coexistence of all citizens of Kosovo, Nikolic said in Saturday’s interview for Italy’s ANSA news agency, on the eve of President Sergio Mattarella’s visit to Belgrade.
He also criticized Pristina for lack of will to fully implement the Brussels agreement and called on European officials to “invest additional efforts to make (Kosovo) Albanians meet what they have signed.”
Nikolic thanked Italy for its strong support to the process of EU integration of Serbia, which he said remains Belgrade’s priority goal.
The Serbian president qualified Serbia-Italy relations as excellent, adding there is always room for their strengthening in the reciprocal field.

The Destabilization of Macedonia? Greater Albania and the Process of “Kosovization”



Macedonia-Old-Flag
The last open armed conflict in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – FYROM (former Socialist Republic of Macedonia as one of six federal republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) is just an expected continuation of constant tensions between the ethnic Albanians and the Macedonian Slavs during the last quarter of century.[i] However, these tensions are time to time transformed into the open armed conflicts of the Albanian extremists, usually coming from Kosovo, with the Macedonian security forces.
The most notable conflict incidents in Macedonia after the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, when the Kosovo Albanians started to export Kosovo revolution to Macedonia, up to 2015 are recorded in 2001 that was ended by the EU/USA sponsored Ohrid Agreement, in 2007 when on November 7th, Macedonian special police forces liquidated six armed Albanians from the neighboring Kosovo on the Shara Mt. in the North Macedonia – the region known from 1991 as the most nationalistic and separatist Albanian area at the Balkans after Kosovo and in 2008 after the parliamentary elections in June.
In the 2007 case, for instance, police found a large amount of hidden arms and ammunition on one location at the Shara Mt. (brought from Kosovo). The Balkan political analysts  are kin to speculate that what is happening in Macedonia after 1999 is just a continuation of the export of the 1998-99 Kosovo revolution.  1998−1999. It basically means that Macedonia is scheduled by the Kosovo Albanian “revolutionaries” (i.e., by the political leadership of the Kosovo Liberation Army−the KLA) to be the next Balkan country which will experience a “Kosovo syndrome” that was successfully finished by the proclamation of the Kosovo independence in February 2008. It is as well as assumed that Montenegro is going to be the third Balkan country infected by the process of Kosovization.
The pre-1991 “Macedonian Question”
Macedonia always was the crossroad of the Balkans having a vital strategic position at the peninsula. The geostrategic importance of Macedonia was probably expressed the best by the German kanzellar Otto von Bismarck: “Those who control the valley of the River Vardar are the masters of the Balkans”.[ii]
A whole historic-geographic territory of Macedonia was formerly part of the Ottoman Empire from 1371 to 1912. Macedonia was the first Yugoslav land to be occupied by the Ottomans and the last one to be liberated from the Ottoman yoke. Before the Ottoman lordship, Macedonia was governed by the Byzantine Empire, Bulgaria and Serbia. A Bulgarian sponsored the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (the IMRO) was established in 1893 in Thessaloniki with the ultimate political goal to include whole Macedonia into Bulgaria. After the Balkans Wars of 1912−1913 a territory of historic-geographic Macedonia was partitioned between Serbia, Greece and Bulgaria. During WWI Macedonia became a scene of fierce fighting between the Central Powers and the Entente (the Macedonian front). Allied forces landed at Thessaloniki in October 1915 to be soon accompanied with approximately 150.000 Serbian soldiers who escaped from the occupied Serbia. In September 1918 under the French General Franchet d’Esperey, a joint British, French and Serbian army advanced against Bulgaria and soon liberated Serbia.[iii]
After the WWI the Treaty of Neuilly confirmed the Vardar Macedonia as a part of the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, while the Aegean Macedonia with Thessaloniki remained the Greek and the Pirin Macedonia the Bulgarian. In the 1920s a large population movement transformed the ethnic composition of the population of the historic-geographic Macedonia. The crucial exchange of population occurred after the Treaty of Lausanne as some 350.000 Muslims from Macedonia were exchanged with Turkey by around 1.200.000 ethnic Greeks from Anatolia. In the interwar time a Bulgarian sponsored IMRO terrorism activity increased in the Yugoslav Macedonia seeking to destabilize the country in order to finally annex Macedonia into Bulgaria.[iv] After 1945 the Vardar Macedonia became a socialist republic within the Yugoslav federation with recognized a separate Macedonian nationality, Macedonian language and alphabet which was standardized for the first time in history. Up to 1991 the Yugoslav authorities fostered Macedonian self-identity and nationalism at the expense of the Serb and Bulgarian national interests.[v] Therefore, for the very reason to keep a territorial integrity of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia, her Albanian minority was not granted a status of an autonomous province like the Kosovo Albanians in Serbia who had, according to the last Yugoslav constitution in 1974, their own president, government, assembly, police, university and academy of sciences – a state within the state.
The post-1991 “Macedonian Question”
During the violent destruction of ex-Yugoslavia, in November 1991 the Socialist Republic of Macedonia proclaimed independence that was firstly recognized by Bulgaria. However, Bulgaria never recognized a separate Macedonian language and ethnicity as for Bulgarians up to today all Macedonian Slavs are ethnolinguistic Bulgarians.[vi] Of course, when Skopje decided to declare independence,  the Macedonians decided at the same time to deal alone with the Albanian nationalism and separatism in Macedonia without help by the Serbs.
The government in Skopje believed that the West will protect a territorial integrity of Macedonia and therefore yet in 1991 NATO’s troops were invited to be deployed in this newly proclaimed independent state which became internationally recognized in 1993 but with a provisional state’s name of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – a unique case in world history. Nevertheless, a new Macedonian constitution, a constitutional state’s name (the Republic of Macedonia) and the state’s symbols created immediately extremely tense and hostile relationships with a neighboring Greece as Skopje developed rival (and unjust) claims to the ethnohistorical heritage of the ancient Macedonians and the Kingdom of Macedonia.[vii] Greece and the FYROM recognized each other five years after the Macedonian official proclamation of independence when Greece lifted economic blockade against the FYROM as well.
However, the crucial challenge to the post-1991 “Macedonian Question” is coming from the ethnic breakdown of the country and historical background of interethnic relations between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians. The later are the biggest and most nationalistic ethnic minority in the FYROM composing today about 30% of total population. Their number increased during the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, especially during the NATO’s “a prominent example of unauthorized humanitarian intervention”[viii] against Serbia and Montenegro, as the Kosovo Albanians, formally as the refugees, came to Macedonia followed by their compatriots from Albania – a country out of any warfare at that time. Majority of those Albanian “refugees”[ix] in fact never returned back to their homeland. Inter-ethnic tensions between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians soon became increased due to both worsening economic situation and the uncompromised Albanian nationalism as an effect of the exported “Kosovo syndrome”.
The “Kosovo syndrome”
The export of the Kosovo revolution after 1999 as a direct outcome of the “Kosovo syndrome” to neighboring Macedonia is in direct connection with much serious regional problem of creation of a Greater Albania from 1878 up today. After June 1999 when the NATO’s troops occupied and divided Kosovo into five occupation zones, transforming this region into their colony,[x] West Macedonia became a stronghold for the rebel Albanian terrorist forces which in fact came from Kosovo.
The Macedonian Albanian separatism backed by the KLA paramilitary troops in the area of Tetovo, Kumanovo and Gostivar in the North-West Macedonia became directly encouraged by the fact that neighboring Kosovo Albanians finally succeeded to separate Kosovo from the rest of Serbia with direct NATO’s and EU military and diplomatic support. The same or very similar scenario was drawn now and for the West Macedonia with Skopje as a capital of the Albanian independent state of the Republic of Ilirida – a state proclaimed by the local Albanian nationalists twice after the destruction of ex-Yugoslavia: in 1992 and in September 2014. Of course, an ultimate goal is pan-Albanian unification with Tirana as a capital of a Greater Albania as it was during the WWII. Here it has to be stressed that between Kosovo, West Macedonia and Albania in fact there is no cross-border checking as it is formally controlled by the Albanians themselves, if it is controlled at all. Therefore, in practice a Greater Albania already exists. Furthermore, the traffic connections between Tirana and Prishtina are planned to be radically improved as the Kosovo Albanian government recently agreed with the government of Albania to connect their two capitals with a modern highway probably financially sponsored by the western economies.
Perspectives
The “Macedonian Question” has always been at the heart of Balkan politics and of interest to the Great Powers. Macedonia – the small, landlocked territory of the South Balkans has been contested during the last 150 years by all of its four neighbors – Serbia, Bulgaria, Albania and Greece. A Socialist Yugoslavia of Josip Broz Tito claimed to have solved the “Macedonian Question” by the establishment of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia as a part of the Yugoslav Federation from 1945 to 1991. Nonetheless, the destruction of the second Yugoslavia in 1991 reopened the issue of the future of the territory of the Vardar Macedonia – a Serbian-Yugoslav part of a geographic-historic Macedonia given to the Kingdom of Serbia by the Bucharest Peace Treaty on August 10th, 1913.[xi] A successor “Republic of Macedonia” has been proclaimed as an independent state in November 1991 but it has not received immediately universal international recognition either of its formal political independence or of its state-flag and state-name.
Basically, after 1991 up today there are three main problems in regard to the “Macedonian Question”:
  1. Will Macedonian state’s territory be divided between the Slavic Macedonians and the ethnic Albanians (who are 30% of Macedonia’s population)?;
  2. Will all members of the international community recognize the name of “Republic of Macedonia” (according to the Macedonian Constitution of 1991) or they will continue to call this country as it is today officially named by the UNO – the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (the FYROM); and
  3. Will the FYROM have  territorial claims on other parts of geographic-historic Macedonia included into Greece (the “Aegean Macedonia”) and Bulgaria (the “Pirin Macedonia”) after the Second Balkan War in 1913?
The Macedonian independence from 1991 created an extremely tense relationship with the Greek government, since Macedonia developed rival claims for ethnicity and statehood. This rivalry was epitomized in a dispute about the state’s name, as Greece objected to the use of Macedonia, whose historical heritage it claimed. These two countries eventually recognized each other in 1995, and the Greek economic blockade against Macedonia was lifted.
Nevertheless, the crucial problem in this country is that the ethnic make up of the FYROM continued to change as the Albanian refugees poured in from Kosovo and Albania increasing the size of the Albanian minority de facto to 30%.
Tensions were increased through the worsening economic situation, which escalated as a result of international sanctions and the war against its main trading partner – ex-Yugoslavia. As the situation in Kosovo escalated and war erupted in 1998−1999, Macedonia became an important stronghold for the moderate Albanian opposition from Kosovo, but also for the rebel KLA. Extremely encouraged by the recognition of the Albanian required rights in Kosovo from June 1999 by the West, the Albanian minority in the West Macedonia became more assertive and politically aggressive.
Following violent clashes in 2001 between the Macedonian police forces and the (Kosovo) Albanian rebels, NATO followed the plea of the pro-western Macedonian government and increased its presence in this South Balkan country. A higher scale of a civil war was narrowly avoided in 2001 when the Macedonian parliament in Skopje agreed, but under direct western (EU/US) pressure and blackmailing, great concessions granting linguistic and limited political autonomy to the Albanian minority in Macedonia.
In return, the KLA rebels in Macedonia (under the official name of the Albanian National Army – the ANA) agreed to give up their arms to NATO’s troops – a gesture that was done more for the TV screens as the main guns’ arsenal of the KLA was returned back to Kosovo to be activated in Macedonia once again on May 9−10th,  2015. This happened regardless of the presence of  NATO’s peace-keeping troops in Macedonia which came in the early 1990s following the plea of the Macedonian government after violent clashes between the Macedonian police and Albanian rebels.
Conclusions
The “Macedonian Question” after the 2001 KLA rebellion in Macedonia primarily was dependent on solving the “Kosovo Question”. In the other words, it was logically expected that in the case of “international” (i.e., the western) recognition of Kosovo and by the west sponsored quasi-independence after February 17th, 2008, the Albanians from the West FYROM (likely followed by their compatriots from the East Montenegro) will follow a Kosovo example of regional revolution for the sake of getting territorial-national independence with a final aim to be united with a motherland Albania as it was clearly noticed even in 1997 by the late Kosovo Albanian leader Ibrahim Rugova and more recently in May 2015 confirmed by the PM of Albania, Edi Rama.
Now we are witnessing a process of practical realization of the Greater Albania project that was designed for the first time by the Albanian First Prizren League in 1878. Or better to say, we are today dealing with the revival of a Greater Albania created by Mussolini in 1941 – a real state that existed until the end of the WWII. A difference is only that the WWII Greater Albania was sponsored by the western nazifascism while a present-day Greater Albania is backed by the western self-proclaimed liberal democracies.
The present Macedonian government of Nikola Gruevski (PM from 2006 and a leader of the VMRO-DPMNE) which has confronted the KLA, is punished (May 2015)  by US-NATO for two reasons:
  1. A Macedonian policy not to introduce sanctions against Russia.
  2. A Macedonian wish to join Russia’s sponsored “Turkish Stream” of supplying Europe with the Siberian gas.
As the current Greek government is becoming closer to Russia,  the Kosovization of Macedonia could be used against Greece, as a means to undermine the Greek pro-Russian policy. Namely, a summer holiday tourism is for Greece one of the most important incomes for the national budget per year. As a huge number of the European tourists are coming to Greece by the highway that is crossing Serbia, Macedonia and exactly the Kumanovo area it can be expected that in the case of conflict situation in the FYROM, the tourist industry in Greece will be affected.
  1. European tourists travelling by land will have to cross conflict areas in Macedonia.
  2. The conflict in Macedonia could spill over into Greece itself and most probably into Serbia.
Finally, the armed KLA rebellion in May 2015 against the state of Macedonia is used as a means to destabilize the government in Skopje in the form of a  Colored Revolution, similar to Belgrade in October 2000. As in  Serbia after October 2000, a new post-revolution Macedonian government sponsored by the West would be instrumental into transforming Macedonia into another client state of the post-Cold War NATO’s World Order. The success of the US-NATO plan very much depends on the role played by Russia.[xii]
Notes
[i] On this issue, see [L. Danforth, The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World, Princeton, 1995].
[ii] M. Glenny, The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804−1999, New York: Viking, 1999, 156.
[iii] On the Macedonian front, see [G. W. Price, The Story of the Salonika Army, London 1918].
[iv] On the terrorism by IMRO, see [A. Londres, Terror in the Balkans, London, 1935].
[v] On this issue, see [S. E. Palmer, R. King, Yugoslav Communism and the Macedonian Question, Connecticut, 1971].
[vi] On the question of ethnic background of the Macedonians, see [H. N. Brailsford, Macedonia – Its Races and Their Future, London, 1906; H. Poulton, Who Are the Macedonians?, London, 1995]. On the Bulgarian standpoint, see [Macedonia: Documents and Material, Sofia, 1974].
[vii] On the Greek point of view, see [N. K. Martis, The Falsification of Macedonian History, Athens, 1984]. The fact is that the ancient “Macedonians were located between the Thracians and the Greeks, inhabiting the fertile plains drained by the Vardar and Struma rivers. From antiquity to the present the question has been debated as to whether these early Macedonians were Greeks or barbarians” [L. S. Stavrianos, The Balkans since 1453, New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc., 1958, 18]. However, the Macedonian kings and aristocracy have been the Greeks in language, culture and outlook who were inviting the Greeks of learning from Greek world to their courts. On the Macedonian point of view, see [S. Konechni, V. Georgieva, Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Macedonia, Skopje, 1998].   
[viii] J. L. Holzgrefe, R. O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge−New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1. On the legal aspect of the humanitarian intervention, see [Ch. Gray, International Law and the Use of Force. Fully Updated Second Edition, Oxford−New York, Oxford University Press, 2004].
[ix] Majority of the Kosovo Albanian “refugees” during the Kosovo War 1998−1999 were not real refugees as they left their homes under the agreement with the KLA in order to show to the mainstream western mass media how the Serbian government is oppressive against the Kosovo ethnic Albanians.
[x] H. Hofbauer, Eksperiment Kosovo: Povratak kolonijalizma, Beograd: Albatros Plus, 2009.
[xi] В. Ћоровић, Наше победе, Београд: Култура, 1990, 82.
[xii] On the NATO, Balkans and Russia after 1991, see [V. B. Sotirović, “The NATO’s World Order, the Balkans and the Russian National Interest”, International Journal of Politics & Law Research, Vol. 3, № 1, Sciknow Publications Ltd., New York, NY, 2015]
GR editor’s note.  We have made minor edits to this article. Due to staff constraints, we were not in a position to carry out a more cohesive editing of this article. mor edit this article.

Opening of EU chapters "depends solely on Kosovo talks"


The opening of first chapters in Serbia's membership negotiations with the EU depends solely on the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina.
Source: Tanjug
(Tanjug, file)
(Tanjug, file)
This is what Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic said on Friday, asked when the expected opening of the first chapter in these talks.
He noted that he thought "Serbia did most of the work," but that this depended "only on the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina."

"I listened to some politicians who said the opening of chapters depends on actions plan for chapters 23 and 24. I have to say that these people have no idea what they're talking about. This is about the community of Serb municipalities, energy and telecommunications, therefore, dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina. There is no other issue and no other condition," said Vucic.

He added that "this is still being talked about and the European Union is appraising whether what has been done in relation to the judiciary, civil defense, municipalities in northern Kosovo and Metohija, as well as the return of Serbs to institutions, is sufficient."

"Everything new that would be done would be shifted to the weight that means the opening of the chapter," Vucic has been quoted as saying by the Tanjug agency.

According to him, "Serbia with its work deserves the opening of chapters," to then "stress that all doors in Europe are open for Serbia," and add that it is "one of the most respected countries in the region and beyond because of its economic reforms."

"European press writes that not only Greece but also some of our neighbors who are in the EU are in trouble, but they do not write that Serbia has a problem because they have a clear insight the Serbian public finances and the budget," said Vucic.

Asked when a Kosovo dialogue round dedicated to the future community of municipalities would be held in Brussels, Vucic said that he was "asked that this happens in the first week of June," but that he would be visiting the United States then, "and make an effort that visit the visit is as brief as possible."

The reason for this, he explained, is that "it seems to him that whenever he leaves there's a hailstorm or a flood."

"That's why I don't make plans for anything longer than two and a half days, even if they invited me New Zealand or Chile - two and a half years and I'm back in the country," said Vucic.