Friday, October 8, 2021

A global energy crisis is coming. There's no quick fix

SManalysis



Julia Horowitz byline
By Julia Horowitz, CNN Business

Updated 1143 GMT (1943 HKT) October 7, 2021


A global energy crunch caused by weather and a resurgence in demand is getting worse, stirring alarm ahead of the winter, when more energy is needed to light and heat homes. Governments around the world are trying to limit the impact on consumers, but acknowledge they may not be able to prevent bills spiking.

Further complicating the picture is mounting pressure on governments to accelerate the transition to cleaner energy as world leaders prepare for a critical climate summit in November.
In China, rolling blackouts for residents have already begun, while in India power stations are scrambling for coal. Consumer advocates in Europe are calling for a ban on disconnections if customers can't promptly settle what they owe.

"This price shock is an unexpected crisis at a critical juncture," EU energy chief Kadri Simson said Wednesday, confirming the bloc will outline its longer-term policy response next week. "The immediate priority should be to mitigate social impacts and protect vulnerable households."

In Europe, natural gas is now trading at the equivalent of $230 per barrel, in oil terms — up more than 130% since the beginning of September and more than eight times higher than the same point last year, according to data from Independent Commodity Intelligence Services.

In East Asia, the cost of natural gas is up 85% since the start of September, hitting roughly $204 per barrel in oil terms. Prices remain much lower in the United States, a net exporter of natural gas, but still have shot up to their highest levels in 13 years.

"A lot of it is feeding off of fear about what the winter's going to look like," said Nikos Tsafos, an energy and geopolitics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank. He thinks that anxiety has caused the market to break away from the fundamentals of supply and demand.

The frenzy to secure natural gas is also pushing up the price of coal and oil, which can be used as substitutes in some cases, but are even worse for the climate. India, which remains extremely dependent on coal, said this week that as many as 63 of its 135 coal-fired power plants have two days or less of supplies.
The circumstances are causing central banks and investors to worry. Rising energy prices are contributing to inflation, which already was a major concern as the global economy tries to shake off the lingering effects of Covid-19. Dynamics over the winter could make matters worse.
No easy solution
The crisis is rooted in soaring demand for energy as the economic recovery from the pandemic takes hold, and a carefully calibrated system that's easily disrupted by weather events or mechanical problems.
An unusually long and cold winter earlier this year depleted stocks of natural gas in Europe. Soaring demand for energy has impeded the restocking process, which typically happens over the spring and summer.

China's growing appetite for liquified natural gas has meant LNG markets can't fill the gap. A decline in Russian gas exports and unusually calm winds have exacerbated the problem.
"The current surge in European energy power prices is truly unique," energy analysts at the Société Générale bank told clients this week. "Never before have power prices risen so far, so fast. And we are only a few days into autumn — temperatures are still mild."

The dynamics are reverberating globally. In the United States, natural gas prices have risen 47% since the beginning of August. The scramble for coal is also triggering a spike in the price many European companies have to pay for carbon credits so they can burn fossil fuels.

Additionally, the energy crunch is supporting oil prices, which hit seven-year highs in the United States this week. Bank of America recently predicted that a cold winter could push the price of Brent crude, the global benchmark, past $100 per barrel. Prices haven't been that high since 2014.
Jim Burkhard, who leads IHS Markit's research on crude oil, energy and mobility, said there's "no immediate relief in sight."

"There's no Saudi Arabia for gas," he said, referring to a single supplier that can quickly ramp up natural gas production. "This looks like it's going to endure for the winter in the Northern Hemisphere."
Russia could theoretically step up. Société Générale noted that faster approval by German authorities of the politically-sensitive Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which would carry gas directly from Russia to Europe, would ease significant stress.

On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin suggested that Russia could increase its output, saying that state-owned gas giant Gazprom has never "refused to increase supplies to its consumers if they submit appropriate bids."
But Neil Chapman, senior vice president at ExxonMobil (XOM), emphasized the short-term constraints at an industry conference this week.

"Of course there's great concern," Chapman said at the virtual Energy Intelligence Forum. "In our industry, because it's capital intensive, you can't just turn on the supply."
Crisis with a cost
The best case scenario, according to Burkhard, is that a winter with average temperatures allows pressure to lift in the second quarter of 2022.

But severe weather in the coming months would create huge strain — particularly in countries that rely heavily on natural gas for energy production, like Italy and the United Kingdom. Britain is in a particularly tough spot because it lacks storage capacity, and is dealing with the fallout from a broken power line with France.

"The UK is arguably at the highest risk of Europe's major economies of a winter supply shortfall," Henning Gloystein, director of the energy, climate and resource team at consultancy Eurasia Group, said in a note to clients this week. "Should this happen, the government would likely demand factories to reduce output and gas consumption in order to ensure household supply."

The massive jump in energy costs, which shows no signs of abating, is fanning inflation fears, which already had been forcing policymakers to carefully consider their next steps.
Energy prices in developed countries rose 18% in August, the fastest pace since 2008, according to data released Tuesday by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. And that was before the situation deteriorated significantly in recent weeks.

Higher energy bills could crimp consumer spending on clothing or activities like dining out, hurting the comeback from the pandemic. If businesses are asked to curtail activity to conserve power, that could also hurt the economy.
"There are concerns that rising gas prices will put Europe's post-pandemic economic recovery at risk," Gloystein said.

There's also anxiety that price volatility could feed public skepticism about funding for the energy transition, according to Gloystein, should consumers demand more investment in oil and gas to limit future fluctuations.

Governments that have committed to reducing emissions are preemptively trying to send a firm message: This bolsters, not undermines, the case for investing in a broader mix of energy sources.
"It's very clear that with energy in the long term, it is important to invest in renewables," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Wednesday. "That gives us stable prices and more independence, because 90% of the gas is imported to the European Union."
— James Frater, Laura He, Katharina Krebs and Diksha Madhok contributed reporting.

Greek Grandma, 87, Faces Trial for Shooting Burglar in Her Own Home

SManalysis


By GR Theo Ioannou
October 7, 2021



The 87-year-old grandmother who shot a burglar after he entered her home in a village in Pyrgos, the Peloponnese, spoke to MEGA TV about her experience. Credit: TV Screenshot
An 87-year-old Greek grandmother in Pyrgos, in the Peloponnese, will go on trial for shooting a burglar who broke into her home. The elderly woman says she had simply had it with burglars, who have broken in and stolen from her five times since last July.

The grandmother shot the burglar with an airgun, after he entered her home from an unbolted back entrance. She is facing charges of causing grave bodily harm. She claims she was frustrated and that she didn’t shoot to kill.

In a television interview on Wednesday, the 87-year-old grandmother said that she was lying in her kitchen bed when she saw a man coming into the house. The burglar was looking for jewelry and cash, according to her testimony.

“It wasn’t the first time he had entered my home,” she explained. “They have stolen my money, they have beaten me, hard, and they just won’t stop.” The burglar was attempting to get to the woman’s handbag when he saw her and attacked her with a stick. He hit her in the face, injuring her right eye.

Grandma shot the burglar with airgun
In defense, she took her airgun and shot him in his left arm, without aiming. “I couldn’t take it anymore,” she says, so “this time I shot at him.” The grandma says that the very same two burglars have broken into her house and stolen from her a total of five times.

She claims that the people who have repeatedly broken into her home are two Roma brothers who live in the area. She says she had told the local police about those incidents and had warned the brothers that if they tried it again, she would shoot them.

The wounded burglar disappeared from the scene, but was later arrested by the police. The 87-year-old grandmother will face charges for shooting him, according to Greek law — even though he entered her home and attacked her.

“If I’m still alive by the time I get to court”
That is, that will happen “if I’m still alive by the time we get to court,” she says, pointing out the typical delays in trials in Greece. Often it takes more than five years for a case to come before the court.

According to her village neighbors, the grandmother lived in Toronto, Canada for over 40 years. She came back to her home village to spend the last years of her life in the place where her family had lived and died.

As for the Roma brothers, one of which was the wounded burglar, the 87-year-old says they live in a nearby village and the local people know about them. “Every time they break into my house, they steal more money,” she says. “I don’t care if I go to prison. I’ve been through worse, I will get through this too.”

Thursday, October 7, 2021

Montgomery: "I am afraid of a new conflict in the Balkans"

SManalysis

Former US Ambassador to Croatia William Montgomery has expressed fears that new conflicts could break out in the Balkans.

SOURCE: KLIX.BA THURSDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2021 | 15:40B92

Foto: EPA/MILOS BICANSKI

He believes that the reason is that not s a single problem in the Balkan countries has been solved.

Montgomery pointed out that an additional problem stands in the fact that it no longer attracts the attention of other countries.

"I think that in the 1990s, this place was the main place in the world that our leaders focused on. Today, that is not the case and I do not believe that these countries can solve the issues that bother them. Feelings from all sides are so upset that I do not see solutions", Montgomery pointed out as a guest on HRT, reports the "Klix" portal.

He also stressed that he believes the European Union does not provide assistance and support to the entire Balkan region.

"I think that people here are somehow lagging behind in terms of their views on other European countries. We should not forget that Germany and France were at war for centuries and stopped only after the Second World War. That will happen to this region as well. However, the most important thing is that the help of the European Union will be needed for that, because this region cannot succeed on its own. It needs full support of the West, the United States and the EU for these changes to happen in time," Montgomery concluded.

In the show, Montgomery spoke extensively about the war in Vietnam, which is one of the topics that found a place in his book, then about NATO and Tito, and he says that the current situation in the United States is not good.

"I could not be a diplomat today because I no longer believe that the American way is necessarily right and that our democratic system is right for the world," Montgomery said, adding that there are now two Americas, which are almost divided in half.

According to him, the existence of those two Americas prevent the work on any open and unresolved issue for the time being.

Tuesday, October 5, 2021

Greece/Turkey Arms Race: French Frigates vs. German Submarines?

SManalysis



By Theo Ioannou

October 5, 2021 Greek Reporter

The arms race between Greece and Turkey could lead to a conflict, with the use of French and German weaponry. 

It may sounds like a Balkan remake of “Dr. Strangelove,” but there is an extreme war scenario where the arms race leads Greece’s forces to use French frigates to fight Turkey, using German submarines.

The respective naval deals of Greece with France and Turkey with Germany raise some questions that must be answered in terms of Europe’s push for strategic autonomy.

The Turkey – Germany deal was announced last July. Ankara tried to boost its naval power by procuring six new submarines from Germany, a move that shows it wants to flex its muscle in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Greece and France sealed their “strategic partnership” in late September, with an agreement for the sale of three frigates, with the option for a fourth. The first two will be delivered by 2025 and the third in 2026.

In June, Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias formally petitioned Berlin against the sale of the six subs. He asked that Germany stop arming a country which has repeatedly violated territorial rights of two EU member states, Greece and Cyprus.

According to the German ministry, Thyssen, the company constructing the six type U-214 submarines, is bound by a contract signed in 2002.

Arms race between Greece and Turkey involves France and Germany
As the episode with the Greek Nautical Geo vessel showed the other day, a minor incident in the Aegean could occur at any time. If that leads into an impasse between Greece and Turkey, the arms race with French frigates and German submarines could come into world view.

Greece 
The Greek Navy will soon have French frigates, while the Turkish Navy will have German subs. Credit: Hellenic National Defense General Staff
Of course these kinds of war games have been hanging over the two countries for over 50 years. Needless to say, both are still members of NATO, despite their endless conflicts.

There have been instances where the two neighboring countries have been close to a war. Turkey’s military invasion of Northern Cyprus in 1974 drew a general Army mobilization on the Greek side. But given the collapse of the Greek junta and the rapid deployment of the Turkish forces, all-out war was ultimately averted.

Crises in 1987 and 1996
Thirteen years later another conflict brought the two countries to the brink of war. Turkey learned that Greece was starting to drill for oil in the vicinity of Greece’s Thasos island, which is disputed by Turkey. In response, the Turkish survey ship Piri Reis was sent to the area with an escort of Turkish warships.

The late prime minister Andreas Papandreou gave orders to sink the ship if it was found in Greek waters. Turkish Prime Minister Turgut Özal said that “If Greece interferes with our vessel in any way, and this is what Papandreou is saying, we will act in the same way against him. As a result, it could be cause for war.”

The crisis was solved when Özal announced that if the Greek government did not enter the disputed waters, the Turks would stay out as well; he participated in a phone call with Papandreou.

And then there was the 1996 crisis over Imia, an uninhabited islet in the Aegean. After the owner of a herd of sheep that remained on the islets hoisted a Greek flag on the island, Turkish journalists from Hurriyet newspaper landed on the islet with a helicopter, lowered the Greek flag and hoisted a Turkish flag.

Greek special forces landed secretly on the east islet undetected. Then Turkish armored units moved to the Green Line on Cyprus, which caused the alert of the Cypriot National Guard, and Turkish special forces commandos also landed undetected on the west of Imia, escalating tensions.

The immediate military threat was defused primarily by American officials. The Greeks and Turks did not speak directly to one another, but were responsive to Washington’s assistance as an informal intermediary. Agreement was given by both sides to the United States to return to the “status quo ante.”

Arms race leads to war games
Greece has always relied on EU support. Turkey is in perpetual negotiations with the EU for  membership. Still, Germany, an EU and NATO member, is arming fellow NATO member Turkey with defense submarines which could be used in a conflict with EU member, Greece.

This might very well be a war game scenario for the ages. It also indicates the terms of “allied rivalry,” if not “allied enmity”, between Greece and Turkey.

Monday, September 27, 2021

Serbia behind recent attacks: Kosovo PM

SManalysis


Serbs from Kosovo's north have blocked two main roads near the border to protest a government ban.

Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti has accused neighbour Serbia of "provoking a serious international conflict", with tensions between the two countries at their highest for years.

In the latest flashpoint, two interior ministry offices in northern Kosovo were on Saturday attacked near border crossings blocked by local Serbs angered by a ban on cars with Serbian licence plates entering the country.

The car registration office in the town of Zubin Potok was set ablaze, and two hand grenades were thrown at the civil registration office in the nearby town of Zvecan, though they did not go off, police said.

There was no mention of any casualties.

Serbs from Kosovo's north have blocked two main roads near the border since the government ban went into force on Monday.

Drivers from Serbia must now use temporary printed registration details that are valid for 60 days.

The Kosovo government says its move mirrors measures in force in Serbia against drivers from Kosovo since 2008, when Kosovo declared independence from their neighbour.

Serb fighter planes flew close to border crossing Jarinje where protesters cheered them. A day before, three helicopters also flew in the vicinity.

Media in Belgrade reported that tanks and other military equipment were heading towards the border, but the Serb army did not give any details.

NATO's mission in Kosovo, where peacekeepers maintain a fragile peace, called for restraint.

"Serbia clearly wants to militarise and escalate the situation. It is bringing close to the border Russian-made helicopters and airplanes," Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti told a news conference.

"Serbia is provoking a serious international conflict."

He accused Serbia of "encouraging and supporting" individuals to attack the state of Kosovo.

Kurti has asked Serbia to start recognising Kosovo car licence plates to allow free movement of people and goods.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has said Kosovo should first remove police units sent to the north of Kosovo to help enforce the car plate measures.

The two countries committed in 2013 to a dialogue sponsored by the European Union to try to resolve outstanding issues but little progress has been made.

Kosovo's independence is recognised by some 110 countries including Australia, the United States, Britain and most Western states, but not by Russia, Serbia's traditional ally, and five EU member states.

War situation between Albania and Serbia for Kosovo

SManalysis




A fuse has been placed between Belgrade and Tirana, because both countries protect the interests of their populations in Kosovo.

Belgrade has stated that the army has returned to the border with Kosovo, due to the violation of freedoms and rights of Serbs in Kosovo, who are violated by the Kosovo government, while Tirana, today stated that Kosovo Albanians are also Albanian citizens ( !) and the country, a member of NATO, has the right to protect it with the Constitution.

In Kosovo, today the Albanians there, learned that they are also citizens of Albania, while the government of Tirana, has made them, with its decision a year ago. But they did not know because even in the political elections in Albania, a few months ago, they were voters of the list of 3.5 million voters in Albania, but did not come to vote because of the pandemic.

This is a new innovation, that the Prime Minister of Albania, a member of NATO, Edi Rama, is also the Prime Minister of the Albanians of Kosovo and even the representation of the Albanians of Kosovo, will be led by Edi Rama (and not Albin Kurti). According to this solution, then the Belgrade-Tirana tension can be turned into a dialogue for the partition of Kosovo.

But rising tensions over the conflict in Kosovo could add to a series of actions and tensions in the Balkans, a situation which could be accompanied by nationalist outbursts, new conflicts even if American and British troops are in the region, especially in Albania, several thousand . The diplomatic scene but also the force remains open let us see to what extent the use of force will be avoided or not.


B92: Rama attacks Serbia from Pristina: "You're defeated on the battlefield" 



Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama attacked Serbia after meeting with Kosovo Prime Minister Albin Kurti in Pristina.

SOURCE: B92, KOSOVO ONLINE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 | 11:42

EPA-EFE/VALDRIN XHEMAJ

He accused Serbia of "making theatrical maneuvers in the north of Kosovo", reports Gazeta Express.

"There is no doubt that in the first place, and above all, Serbia must recognize this irreversible reality, and it is really unfortunate that instead of concrete progress in dialogue towards mutual recognition and final reconciliation with the past, today we are witnessing Serbia's theatrical military maneuvers on the border with sovereign state of Kosovo", Rama said.

According to him, "these maneuvers do not actually protect the Serbs in the north of Kosovo, as the official Belgrade leadership claims, with the support of some ghosts of generals of the defeated army on the battlefield, more than 20 years ago, who seem to have come out of the grave claiming to protect integrity and the security of Serbian citizens in Kosovo".

He referred to the actions of Serbs in the north theatrical maneuvers, while he also mentioned that the Government of Kosovo paid for electricity for Serbs in the north.

"In fact, Serbian citizens in Kosovo live without any threat, and it is even said that the government of this country paid their electricity bills, which no one does anywhere, not only in the Balkans, but also worldwide," Rama said. 

Thursday, September 23, 2021

Serbian Armed Forces raised combat readiness to the highest level

SManalysis 


B92


Defense Minister Nebojsa Stefanovic and Chief of the General Staff of the Serbian Army, General Milan Mojsilovic, went to Raska.

SOURCE: B92, RTS, TANJUG THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 | 14:45

They are touring part of the forces of the Serbian Army, which raised combat readiness to the highest level.

The visit was preceded by a meeting with the commanders of the units of the Serbian Army, the Ministry of Defense announced.



Just to reiterate that in the south of Serbia, for the fourth day in a row, there is tension at the administrative crossings towards Kosovo and Metohija, Jarinje and Brnjak, after the decisions of the Pristina authorities to ban Serbian license plates on the territory of Kosovo and Metohija.

Both crossings are blocked, with ROSU special units on one side and dissatisfied Serbs on the other. KFOR helicopters are also in charge of the area.

Foto: Ministarstvo odbrane
Foto: Ministarstvo odbrane
Defense Minister of Serbia said that the units of the Serbian Army are in high combat readiness in the garrisons of Raska and Novi Pazar, because in that way the state wants to send a clear message that the pogrom of the Serbian people will not happen again.

"Our army does not provoke, but it is ready to protect the people if anything that endangers their lives happens. It is important for me to see that these people are prepared and ready. The equipment we procured is in the right hands of professionals," Minister said.

Stefanović estimates that President Aleksandar Vučić is making great moves in order to de-escalate the current situation in the north of Kosovo and Metohija.

Foto: Ministarstvo odbrane
Foto: Ministarstvo odbrane
He also commented on calling on "both sides" to refrain from provocations coming from the EU.

"What did Belgrade do? Every provocation was made by Pristina, including this what you could see in Jarinje and Brnjak. Unfortunately, the latest event, the beating of Serbs. Everything that is happening indicates how right the president was when he he said that it would happen, that it was part of an organized campaign", Minister said.

Stefanovic adds that he expects a reaction from the EU and KFOR, but that the most important thing at the moment is to protect the lives of Serbs, Sputnik reported.

Sunday, July 11, 2021

Ελλάδα-Κόσοβο: Το πουλάκι που πέταξε και η χωρίς αντάλλαγμα αναγνώριση

SManalysis




Η Δημοσιογραφία για να είναι αδέσμευτη-ανεξάρτητη πρέπει να χρηματοδοτείται κυρίως από τους αναγνώστες. 

Τώρα, Ελλάδα και Αλβανία έχουν συμφωνήσει ότι εάν οι διμερείς συνομιλίες για την οριοθέτηση υφαλοκρηπίδας-ΑΟΖ δεν καταλήξουν, να παραπέμψουν το ζήτημα στη Χάγη. Μπορεί ο Ράμα να κάνει “τσαλίμια”, αλλά δεν μπορεί τελικώς να υπεκφύγει από αυτό τον δρόμο. Ο δε σεβασμός των δικαιωμάτων της ελληνικής μειονότητας στη Βόρειο Ήπειρο και ειδικά το ζήτημα της λεηλασίας των περιουσιών της δεν είναι ενδεχόμενο αντάλλαγμα προς την Ελλάδα. Είναι υποχρέωση της Αλβανίας και πρέπει να είναι απαράβατος όρος για την προώθηση της ενταξιακής πορείας της προς την ΕΕ.

Η πολιτική της Δύσης στα Βαλκάνια υπαγορευόταν πάντα από την επιδίωξη να εκτοπιστεί η ρωσική επιρροή από την περιοχή. Μετά την κατάρρευση του Ανατολικού Συνασπισμού, αυτή η επιδίωξη –μεταξύ άλλων– οδήγησε στη διάλυση της Γιουγκοσλαβίας, στη συμφωνία του Ντέιτον (1995), με την οποία ιδρύθηκε το θνησιγενές κράτος της Βοσνίας-Ερζεγοβίνης, στον βομβαρδισμό της Σερβίας και στο αποσχισθέν Κόσοβο (1999), στη συμφωνία της Αχρίδας (2001) μεταξύ του σλαβικού και του αλβανικού στοιχείου της τότε FYROM και πιο πρόσφατα στη Συμφωνία των Πρεσπών (2018).

Για τον ίδιο λόγο τώρα η κυβέρνηση Μπάιντεν, με τη σύμπραξη Ευρωπαίων, πιέζει για την διπλωματική αναγνώριση του Κοσόβου από όσα δυτικά και φιλοδυτικά κράτη δεν το έχουν ήδη αναγνωρίσει. Στον χορό μπήκε τις τελευταίες ημέρες και το Ισραήλ, παρότι η σερβική πρεσβεία είχε συμφωνηθεί να μετακινηθεί στην Ιερουσαλήμ. Υπενθυμίζουμε ότι –με πράσινο φως από τη Δύση– το Κόσοβο ανακηρύχθηκε ανεξάρτητο κράτος το 2008. Μέχρι τότε, ήταν προτεκτοράτο του ΟΗΕ, στην πραγματικότητα της Δύσης.

Το Κόσοβο έχουν αναγνωρίσει 98 από τα 193 κράτη-μέλη του ΟΗΕ, 22 από τα 27 της ΕΕ, 26 από τα 30 κράτη-μέλη του ΝΑΤΟ και 34 από τα 57 κράτη-μέλη του Οργανισμού Ισλαμικής Διάσκεψης. Όπως προκύπτει από τα παραπάνω, η διεθνής κοινότητα είναι διχασμένη, ακόμα και σε ΕΕ και ΝΑΤΟ υπάρχουν κράτη που για διάφορους λόγους δεν έχουν κάνει το βήμα.

Ο βασικός λόγος είναι πως το Κόσοβο προέκυψε ως κράτος μετά τον ακρωτηριασμό της Σερβίας, ο οποίος προέκυψε από τη στρατιωτική επέμβαση της Δύσης. Με άλλα λόγια, αρκετά κράτη δεν θέλουν να νομιμοποιήσουν μία πράξη, η οποία καταπάτησε ωμά την αρχή για το απαραβίαστο των συνόρων (την έχει υπογράψει η Δύση) κι αναπόφευκτα δημιουργεί προηγούμενο, το οποίο μπορεί να βρει μιμητές. Η Ισπανία δεν αναγνωρίζει το Κόσοβο λόγω Καταλονίας και η Ρουμανία λόγω Υπερδνειστερίας.

Είναι προφανές γιατί η Κυπριακή Δημοκρατία δεν αναγνωρίζει το Κόσοβο. Αλλά και η Ελλάδα αν το αναγνωρίσει, με ποιο επιχείρημα θα διαμαρτυρηθεί αύριο αν αναγνωρισθεί το τουρκοκυπριακό ψευδοκράτος; Επιπλέον, δεν πρέπει να μας διαφεύγει ότι οι Τούρκοι ονειρεύονται να επαναλάβουν στη Θράκη όσα έπραξαν το 1974 στην Κύπρο. Όπως και εκεί, έτσι και εδώ θα επικαλεστούν ως πρόσχημα τη μουσουλμανική μειονότητα.

Δυτικές πιέσεις για το Κόσοβο
Αν και το εθνικό συμφέρον είναι ξεκάθαρα κατά της αναγνώρισης, η Ελλάδα πιέζεται και από την Ουάσινγκτον και από την ΕΕ να αναγνωρίσει το Κόσοβο και μάλιστα χωρίς ανταλλάγματα. Αναμφίβολα, στο Κόσοβο έχουν δημιουργηθεί πολιτικά και διπλωματικά τετελεσμένα, τα οποία ωθούν προς την αναγνώριση. Το ίδιο, όμως, ισχύει και για την κατεχόμενη Κύπρο. Κατά συνέπεια, αυτό δεν είναι ένα επιχείρημα, το οποίο μπορεί να επικαλεστεί η Αθήνα.

Από την άλλη πλευρά, διαδοχικές ελληνικές κυβερνήσεις έχουν ανοίξει διαύλους με την Πρίστινα και έχουν κάνει βήματα ανάπτυξης των διμερών σχέσεων, χωρίς, όμως, να κάνουν το οριστικό βήμα της επίσημης αναγνώρισης, κυρίως λόγω Κύπρου. Κατά τα άλλα, για την Ελλάδα το πρόβλημα δεν αφορά μόνο τη σχέση της με ένα –έστω και ημιαναγνωρισμένο διεθνώς– κράτος της περιοχής. Στην πραγματικότητα αφορά τη σχέση της με την Αλβανία και τη Σερβία, σε ποιο σημείο θα ισορροπήσει μεταξύ τους.

Γιατί ο εμβολιασμός (ή όχι) δεν είναι ατομικό δικαίωμα
Με τη Σερβία υπάρχουν ιστορικοί δεσμοί, αφού τα δύο έθνη ήταν πάντα στην ίδια πλευρά στους πολέμους. Η Αθήνα έχει κάθε λόγο να διατηρεί καλές σχέσεις με το Βελιγράδι, αλλά όχι συναισθηματικές υπερβολές. Υπενθυμίζουμε πως η Σερβία είχε αναγνωρίσει εξαρχής τα Σκόπια σαν “Μακεδονία”, επειδή έκρινε ότι αυτό υπαγόρευαν τα συμφέροντά της. Κατά συνέπεια, η ελληνική στάση στο ζήτημα του Κοσόβου πρέπει να καθορισθεί από το τι εξυπηρετεί τα ελληνικά συμφέροντα, σταθμίζοντας συνολικά όλους τους παράγοντες.

Οι δύσκολες ελληνοαλβανικές σχέσεις
Οι ελληνοαλβανικές σχέσεις έχουν αρνητικό ιστορικό, αλλά και σήμερα είναι δύσκολες. Η “μεγάλη ιδέα” των Αλβανών είναι η “Μεγάλη Αλβανία”, η ένωση με το Κόσοβο και η ενσωμάτωση στο κοινό κράτος του αλβανικού στοιχείου αφενός της Βόρειας Μακεδονίας, αφετέρου της νότιας Σερβίας (Πρέσεβο και Μπουγιάνοβατς), ενώ αναφορές γίνονται και για τη Θεσπρωτία, όπου, όμως, δεν υπάρχει αλβανικό στοιχείο.

Η Ελλάδα έχει πρόσθετο στόχο να είναι επιφυλακτική με την Αλβανία, παρότι φιλοξενεί τα τελευταία 30 χρόνια εκατοντάδες χιλιάδες Αλβανούς οικονομικούς μετανάστες. Τα Τίρανα έχουν την τάση –περισσότερο ή λιγότερο ανάλογα με την εκάστοτε κυβέρνηση– να αναπτύσσουν προνομιακές σχέσεις με την Άγκυρα, θεωρώντας ότι κατ’ αυτόν τον τρόπο εξισορροπούν την ιστορικά υπαρκτή (Βορειοηπειρωτικό), αλλά σήμερα ανύπαρκτη ελληνική πίεση. Στο πλαίσιο αυτό έχει αναβιώσει στην Αλβανία μία σύγχρονη εκδοχή ανθελληνικού “τουρκαλβανισμού”.

Για τους Τούρκους, η προνομιακή σχέση με την Αλβανία (διμερής στρατιωτική συνεργασία και τουρκική ναυτική βάση στον Αυλώνα) είναι ένας τρόπος “περικύκλωσης” της Ελλάδας. Προς την ίδια κατεύθυνση –εκτός των άλλων σκοπιμοτήτων– λειτουργεί και η τουρκική στρατιωτική παρουσία στη Λιβύη. Δεν είναι τυχαίο ότι μετά από δύο αιώνες ο τουρκικός στόλος πραγματοποιεί ασκήσεις νότια και δυτικά της Ελλάδας.

Το αντάλλαγμα για την αναγνώριση
Αν και τρεις δεκαετίες μετά την πτώση του καθεστώτος Χότζα, η Αλβανία παραμένει ένα ιδιαιτέρως προβληματικό κράτος, ο αλβανικός παράγοντας είναι σημαντικός για τις ισορροπίες στα Βαλκάνια. Η δε διεθνής αναγνώριση του Κοσόβου είναι βασική συνιστώσα του. Όπως προανέφερα, λόγω Κύπρου, η Ελλάδα έχει ισχυρό λόγο να μην προχωρήσει σε αναγνώριση.

Από την άλλη, η πίεση που δέχεται η Αθήνα από ΗΠΑ και Ευρωπαίους εταίρους είναι έντονη. Και όπως γνωρίζουμε ούτε οι προηγούμενες, ούτε η παρούσα ελληνική κυβέρνηση διακρίνονται για την αντίστασή τους σε δυτικές πιέσεις. Αυτό πρακτικά σημαίνει ότι το ενδεχόμενο η Ελλάδα να αναγνωρίσει προσεχώς το Κόσοβο δεν μπορεί να αποκλεισθεί, αν και το πιθανότερο είναι η αναβάθμιση των σχέσεων Αθήνας-Πρίστινας, χωρίς όμως την de jure αναγνώριση.

Νέο βουλγαρικό χτύπημα στα Σκόπια, μία ημέρα πριν τις εκλογές
Αμέσως μετά την ανακήρυξη της ανεξαρτησίας (2008), η Δύση αναζητούσε κράτη να αναγνωρίσουν το Κόσοβο. Τότε, είχα υποστηρίξει ότι η Ελλάδα θα μπορούσε να το αναγνωρίσει, θέτοντας ως όρο (αντάλλαγμα) τα Τίρανα, η Πρίστινα, η αλβανική κοινότητα της τότε FYROM, αλλά και ΗΠΑ και ΕΕ, να ταχθούν επισήμως υπέρ μίας λύσης του Μακεδονικού, η οποία να στηρίζεται σε δύο πυλώνες:

Πρώτον, το όνομα του κράτους να είναι σύνθετη ονομασία με γεωγραφικό προσδιορισμό, κατά προτίμηση Άνω Μακεδονία, με την ιθαγένεια ως παράγωγο της κρατικής ονομασίας (ανωμακεδονική).
Δεύτερον, οι δύο εθνότητες να είναι η σλαβομακεδονική (σλαβομακεδονική και η γλώσσα της) και η αλβανική (αλβανική η γλώσσα της).
Εάν ο αλβανικός παράγοντας και η Δύση υιοθετούσαν –όπως ήταν πιθανόν εκείνη την περίοδο– αυτή τη θέση, θα ήταν πολύ δύσκολο για τους Σλαβομακεδόνες (ακόμα και για την τότε κυβέρνηση Γκρουέφσκι) να την αγνοήσουν. Η δε Δύση θα είχε κίνητρο να πιέσει προς αυτή την κατεύθυνση τα Σκόπια και πάντως το πολιτικό της δημιούργημα, τον Ζόραν Ζάεφ. Με άλλα λόγια, πιθανότατα το Μακεδονικό να είχε πάρει άλλη τροπή και να μην είχαμε φθάσει ποτέ στη Συμφωνία των Πρεσπών, με την οποία η Ελλάδα (Τσίπρας-Κοτζιάς) παρέδωσε στους Σλαβομακεδόνες τη μακεδονική ταυτότητα.

Οριοθέτηση ΑΟΖ και ελληνική μειονότητα
Αυτά, ωστόσο, αφορούν στο παρελθόν. Ας σημειωθεί ότι ο Κοτζιάς είχε συζητήσει το ενδεχόμενο η Ελλάδα να αναγνωρίσει το Κόσοβο, με “αντάλλαγμα”, η Αλβανία να συμφωνήσει για την οριοθέτηση ΑΟΖ-υφαλοκρηπίδας. Και λέμε “αντάλλαγμα”, επειδή η συμφωνία οριοθέτησης είναι μία αναγκαία διευθέτηση μεταξύ δύο κρατών κι όχι αλβανικό αντάλλαγμα προς την Ελλάδα.

Τώρα, Ελλάδα και Αλβανία έχουν συμφωνήσει ότι εάν οι διμερείς συνομιλίες για την οριοθέτηση υφαλοκρηπίδας-ΑΟΖ δεν καταλήξουν, να παραπέμψουν το ζήτημα στη Χάγη. Μπορεί ο Ράμα να κάνει “τσαλίμια”, αλλά δεν μπορεί τελικώς να υπεκφύγει από αυτό τον δρόμο. Ο δε σεβασμός των δικαιωμάτων της ελληνικής μειονότητας στη Βόρειο Ήπειρο και ειδικά το ζήτημα της λεηλασίας των περιουσιών της δεν είναι ενδεχόμενο αντάλλαγμα προς την Ελλάδα. Είναι υποχρέωση της Αλβανίας και πρέπει να είναι απαράβατος όρος για την προώθηση της ενταξιακής πορείας της προς την ΕΕ.

Τώρα, σε διακρατικό επίπεδο, τα Τίρανα και η Πρίστινα δεν έχουν να προσφέρουν στην Αθήνα απτό και μη αντιστρέψιμο αντάλλαγμα που να εξισορροπεί πολιτικά το γεγονός ότι η εκ μέρους της αναγνώριση του Κοσόβου δημιουργεί αρνητικό προηγούμενο για την Κύπρο και επιπροσθέτως επιβαρύνει τις σχέσεις με το Βελιγράδι. Το παράθυρο ευκαιρίας για να μετατρέψουμε τον αλβανικό παράγοντα σε σύμμαχο στο Μακεδονικό κράτησε μία δεκαετία (2008-2018), αλλά δυστυχώς η Αθήνα το άφησε ανεκμετάλλευτο. Πλέον, το πουλάκι έχει πετάξει…

Saturday, July 10, 2021

Hungary sets up new road block to Tirana’s and Skopje’s EU accession process

SManalysis

For the North Macedonians and Albanians, Orban’s statement that EU expansion into the Western Balkans is impossible without Serbia will be another blow to their aspirations. With Albania facing resistance from Greece due to persecutions against the Greek National Minority in southern Albania, and North Macedonia facing opposition from Bulgaria, Hungary has added another dimension to the EU’s hopes of expansion into the Western Balkans.

by PAUL ANTONOPOULOS

Albania North Macedonia EU European Union flags Hungary
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who met with Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić in Belgrade on Thursday, told Brussels that it must be aware that there will be no European Union accession for Western Balkan countries without the central state of the region – Serbia. Such a message from Orban must be taken seriously considering Hungary has veto rights in the EU and will certainly take advantage of it, especially as the prime minister attempts to position his country as a key player in the region.

Hungary’s position within the EU is strengthening because of its independent policy, thus causing immense frustration in Western Europe. Budapest’s position is partly based on cooperation with Visegrad Group members (V4), consisting of four Central European countries – Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Through V4, these countries are furthering Central European integration, including in the economic and energy spheres. Hungary is also becoming a more active regional player in the Balkans, especially through their cooperation with Serbia.

The relations between Serbia and Hungary are at the highest possible level today, whether it be economic, political or cultural. The two countries have a number of regional projects that connect them, perhaps the most important being the Turk Stream gas pipeline, which was only recently realized. With Serbia becoming an energy hub for the Balkans and Central Europe, Hungary has become Serbia’s most reliable partner in the region.

For his part, Vučić said to Orban: “Many say that they support Serbia’s path to the EU, but few act bravely and openly, ready to suffer criticism because of Serbia, as you do.”

EU Needs Serbia, 'Key to Western Balkans', Orban Says | Balkan Insight
Victor Orban (left) and Aleksandr Vučić (right).
He also pointed out that Hungary was once Serbia’s 13th largest trading partner but today is fifth. This is only going to increase, especially when the construction of the Belgrade to Budapest high-speed railway line is complete. The highspeed railway line between Belgrade and Novi Sad, Serbia’s second city located between Belgrade and Hungary, will be completed by the end of the year. Construction for the section between Novi Sad and Subotica, Serbia’s border city with Hungary, will begin in September.

Both Novi Sad and Subotica are in Serbia’s northern Vojvodina autonomous region, which has a significant Hungarian minority of about 250,000 people, or 13% of the population in the region. The cooperation that Belgrade has with the Hungarian minority in Vojvodina contributes to the trust between Serbia and Hungary as minorities live without persecution or harassment from the state, something that Orban identifies.

The biggest impact of Orban’s visit was his statement: “I understand Serbia and I think that it should be admitted to the EU because it is the central country of the Western Balkans, without whose accession to the EU there will be no admission for others. Serbia is a key country.”

The EU is attempting to fast-track Albania’s and North Macedonia’s accession into the bloc without any consideration for Serbia despite being the economic powerhouse of the Western Balkans.

Greece long objected North Macedonia’s accession because of the name dispute, but with that issue mostly resolved following the 2018 Prespa Agreement, it appeared the path was clear. However, in November 2020, Bulgaria effectively blocked the official start of North Macedonia’s EU Accession Negotiations because of Skopje’s violations of the 2017 Friendship Treaty between the two countries, with Sofia claiming its western neighbour is engaging in state-supported hate speech and minority claims against Bulgaria.

Bulgaria even escalated the breakdown in relations by claiming that there is no Macedonian language, but rather the language of North Macedonia is a Bulgarian dialect, a sentiment seemingly shared last week by the Portuguese Deputy Foreign Minister Ana Paula Zacarias, Secretary of State for European Affairs.

The Portuguese official, whose country holds the presidency of the EU, commented that: “Negotiations between North Macedonia and Bulgaria are difficult… obviously related to the language of North Macedonia, which previously was Bulgarian.”

For the North Macedonians and Albanians, Orban’s statement that EU expansion into the Western Balkans is impossible without Serbia will be another blow to their aspirations. With Albania facing resistance from Greece due to persecutions against the Greek National Minority in southern Albania, and North Macedonia facing opposition from Bulgaria, Hungary has added another dimension to the EU’s hopes of expansion into the Western Balkans.

EU blocks Albania and North Macedonia membership bids - BBC News

In this way, not only does Orban help strengthen Serbia’s position in Europe, particularly in its relations with Brussels, but he also positions Hungary as the leading state of Central Europe that wields significant influence in not only V4, but also the Balkans. It is likely that this will cause further tensions between Budapest and Brussels as Western Europe becomes increasingly frustrated that they are restricted from expanding their own influence because of a relatively small Central European country.

Sunday, June 20, 2021

Ο Ράμα ζητά πολεμικές αποζημιώσεις ως αντάλλαγμα για την Χάγη

SManalysis


 Επικαιρότητα  Reporter  Παρασκευή 18 Ιουνίου 2021, 23:00  Himara

ΠΕΡΙΠΛΟΚΕΣ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΩΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΗΝ ΑΡΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΜΠΟΛΕΜΟΥ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΑΛΒΑΝΙΑ

Πολεμικές αποζημιώσεις ζητεί ο Ράμα ως αντάλλαγμα για την Χάγη

Οι απαιτήσεις για επιστροφή περιουσιών υπό μεσεγγύησιν

ΤΕΛΙΚΩΣ η προσφυγή στην Χάγη για την οριοθέτηση των θαλασσίων ζωνών στο Ιόνιο δεν είναι τόσο απλή υπόθεσις όσο πίστευαν ορισμένοι. Ήτο πράγματι έκπληξις το γεγονός ότι η Αλβανία και μάλιστα υπό την ηγεσία του μηχανορράφου ῎Εντι Ράμα συνεφώνησε τόσο απλά σε μια νομότυπη διαδικασία η οποία συμφώνως προς όλες τις προβλέψεις θα δικαίωνε τις ελληνικές θέσεις. Όμως δεν συνεφώνησε «τόσο απλά». Ζητεί ανταλλάγματα. Και δεν είναι η πρώτη φορά. Συνήθως η Αλβανία λειτουργεί σε λογική συναλλαγών. Το ερώτημα είναι εάν οι απαιτήσεις της κινούνται εντός λογικού πλαισίου. Κάτι που συνήθως δεν συμβαίνει. Ακόμη και όταν οι απαιτήσεις είναι μόνον οικονομικές.

Είναι γεγονός ότι ο Έντι Ράμα, ο οποίος έθεσε ζήτημα αποζημιώσεως περιουσιών που απωλέσθησαν ή κατεστράφησαν κατά τον πόλεμο, δεν ετόλμησε να ομιλήσει για τις περιουσίες των Τσάμηδων. Κάτι τέτοιο δεν υπήρχε επ' ουδενί περίπτωσις να γίνει δεκτό από την Ελλάδα. «Περιορίσθηκε» λοιπόν να ζητήσει ως αντάλλαγμα για να υπογράψει το συνυποσχετικό, που είναι απαραίτητο για την Χάγη, την αποζημίωση για περιουσίες που τελούσαν υπό μεσεγγύησιν από τον καιρό του πολέμου.

Βεβαίως το γνωρίζαμε ότι υπάρχει τέτοια απαίτησις. Ο Έντι Ράμα την είχε θέσει και κατά το παρελθόν προς τον τότε υπουργό Εξωτερικών Νίκο Κοτζιά στο πλαίσιο της συζητήσεως για την άρση του εμπολέμου μεταξύ των δύο χωρών.

Τότε, την κατάσταση «έσωσε» ο Πρόεδρος της Δημοκρατίας Προκόπης Παυλόπουλος, ο οποίος εξήγησε στην κυβέρνηση της εποχής αφ' ενός ότι κάτι τέτοιο θα άνοιγε τον ασκό του Αιόλου –οπότε μπορεί να αποκτούσαν εφαλτήριο και οι Τσάμηδες για τις δικές του διεκδικήσεις– αφ' ετέρου και τα χρήματα που θα απητούντο δεν είναι καθόλου ευκαταφρόνητα. Κάποιοι ομιλούν για δεκάδες ή και εκατοντάδες εκατομμυρίων ευρώ. Και το χειρότερο είναι ότι «παράθυρα» στην απαίτηση αυτή έχει ανοίξει μία, μάλλον κακοδιατυπωμένη, απόφασις του Συμβουλίου της Επικρατείας.

Τίθεται λοιπόν το ερώτημα, για ποιόν λόγο η Κυβέρνησις έσπευσε να ομιλήσει για συμφωνία με την Αλβανία και συνυποσχετικό για την Χάγη; Ήταν πρόθυμη να υποχωρήσει στον εκβιασμό του Έντι Ράμα προκειμένου να φθάσουμε στο διεθνές δικαστήριο για την οριοθέτηση των θαλασσίων ζωνών; Και για ποιόν λόγο, τίποτε από αυτά δεν έγινε δημοσίως γνωστό; Για ποιόν λόγο οι Έλληνες αφέθησαν να πιστεύουν ότι θα πηγαίναμε στην Χάγη με ένα καλή τη πίστει συνυποσχετικό που θα υπέγραφε η Αλβανία;

Δυστυχώς, καλή πίστη η Αλβανία ουδέποτε επέδειξε. Ούτε ακόμη και όσον αφορά τον σεβασμό των δικαιωμάτων των Βορειοηπειρωτών, των οποίων κλείνει τις Εκκλησίες και αρπάζει τις περιουσίες. Για να μην πούμε και τα χειρότερα, των οποίων κορυφή του παγόβουνου μόνον είναι η δολοφονία του Κωνσταντίνου Κατσίφα, ο οποίος τρία σχεδόν χρόνια μετά παραμένει αδικαίωτος!

Εν αντιθέσει με εμάς, οι Αλβανοί δεν ξεχνούν τίποτε. Συνεχίζουν να επικαλούνται μεσεγγυήσεις και να διεκδικούν αποζημιώσεις. Πόσες αποζημιώσεις θα έπρεπε να ζητεί όμως η Ελλάς, εξ ονόματος των Βορειοηπειρωτών για όσα έχουν υποστεί από το αλβανικό καθεστώς, πρωτοστατούντος σήμερα του Ράμα;

Πηγή: Εφημερίδα Εστία

Thursday, June 10, 2021

"NATO would not react if Milosevic accepted Rambouillet Agreement"

SManalysis



If the former Yugoslav leadership had accepted the Rambouillet agreement, it wouldn't have been possible for NATO operation to be implemented, Wesley Clark said

SOURCE: TANJUG THURSDAY, JUNE 10, 2021 | 10:15

Clark said that the intervention ended, as he claims, the ethnic cleansing that was happening at that moment, and that the citizens of Kosovo were given the opportunity to establish security and democracy.

Clark, however, believes that "the job is not finished yet", because there are still tensions between Serbia and Kosovo, and as he says, tensions exist between Bulgaria and North Macedonia, as well as in the Balkans.

Clark claims that "the agreement offered to President Slobodan Milosevic was basically identical to the agreement envisaged for Bosnia and Herzegovina."

He estimates that Milosevic was rather "conceited". "When NATO troops were to be transferred to Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1995, Milosevic agreed and said that this could be done through the territory of Serbia.

Four years later, he changed his mind, rejecting everything offered. He sabotaged relations, negotiations and in fact made conflict inevitable. And he stubbornly persisted in that", Clark claims.

He also claims that the airstrikes "were directed against the then political regime."

He says that Milosevic did not change his mind and resorted to armed conflict.

"His troops committed numerous brutalities in Kosovo, so he made the outcome inevitable," Clark said, adding that after only a few days, it became clear to the Alliance that Milosevic must give up Kosovo.

"If he had not resorted to weapons, reconciliation might have been possible, there might have been more peace today, there would have been no current tensions," Clark said, adding that Serbian military and police forces had withdrawn from Kosovo, but that Serbia is still ubiquitously dissatisfied with the outcome.

Asked by Voice of America if there were words of consolation for citizens who had nothing to do with Milosevic, but they and their families suffered, Clark said that "the 1990s were difficult years for Serbs".

Clark also says he felt 'horrified' about the civilian casualties caused by their misdirection. He said there were things they did wrong during the campaign and people lost their lives. The NATO intervention began on March 24, ending on June 10, 1999, and the decision to intervene, without the consent of the United Nations, was taken after unsuccessful negotiations in Rambouillet and Paris, in February and March 1999.

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

Executive Order on Blocking Property And Suspending Entry Into The United States Of Certain Persons Contributing To The Destabilizing Situation In The Western Balkans

SManalysis




Eventually, what was expected happened. If Greece has left Albania free to do what it wants with Himara where ethnic Greeks live and has not stopped the actions of the Albanian governments (this includes all the assets of the Greeks from Vlora to Saranda and Eksamil), the USA has presented the revenge plan for politicians and mafia gangs who have looted Greek property and nationalized them with unconstitutional laws, while alienating them by building villas and hotels, selling them or doing business. But Stop. From now on, from President Biden's decision, Himara will have special protection (USA, NATO), and whoever dares, whether politicians or mafia groups, will be punished. Only in this way will the dignity of Himara be restored, which will remain, as it were, free and prosperous....




JUNE 08, 2021

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, hereby expand the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13219 of June 26, 2001 (Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans), as amended by Executive Order 13304 of May 28, 2003 (Termination of Emergencies With Respect to Yugoslavia and Modification of Executive Order 13219 of June 26, 2001), finding that the situation in the territory of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Albania (the Western Balkans), over the past two decades, including the undermining of post-war agreements and institutions following the breakup of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, as well as widespread corruption within various governments and institutions in the Western Balkans, stymies progress toward effective and democratic governance and full integration into transatlantic institutions, and thereby constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. 

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1.  (a)  All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:  any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:
          (i)    to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or territorial integrity of any area or state in the Western Balkans;
          (ii)   to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in the Western Balkans;
          (iii)  to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, a violation of, or an act that has obstructed or threatened the implementation of, any regional security, peace, cooperation, or mutual recognition agreement or framework or accountability mechanism related to the Western Balkans, including the Prespa Agreement of 2018; the Ohrid Framework Agreement of 2001; United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244; the Dayton Accords; or the Conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference Council held in London in December 1995, including the decisions or conclusions of the High Representative, the Peace Implementation Council, or its Steering Board; or the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, or, with respect to the former Yugoslavia, the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals;
          (iv)   to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse in the Western Balkans;
          (v)    to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, corruption related to the Western Balkans, including corruption by, on behalf of, or otherwise related to a government in the Western Balkans, or a current or former government official at any level of government in the Western Balkans, such as the misappropriation of public assets, expropriation of private assets for personal gain or political purposes, or bribery;
          (vi)   to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or 
          (vii)  to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
     (b)  The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order. 

Sec. 2.  The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include:
     (a)  the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
     (b)  the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 3.  I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 1(a) of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13219, as amended by Executive Order 13304, and as expanded in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4.  (a)  The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of noncitizens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section l(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended, except when the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate, determines that the person’s entry would not be contrary to the interests of the United States, including when the Secretary of State or Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate, so determines, based on a recommendation of the Attorney General, that the person’s entry would further important United States law enforcement objectives. 
     (b)  The Secretary of State shall implement this order as it applies to visas pursuant to such procedures as the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, may establish. 
     (c)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement this order as it applies to the entry of noncitizens pursuant to such procedures as the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may establish.
     (d)  Such persons shall be treated by this section in the same manner as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 5.  (a)  Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
     (b)  Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6.  For the purposes of this order:
     (a)  the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;
     (b)  the term “noncitizen” means any person who is not a citizen or noncitizen national of the United States;
     (c)  the term “person” means an individual or entity; and
     (d)  the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7.  For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual.  I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13219, as amended by Executive Order 13304, and as expanded by this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8.  The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order.  The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury.  All executive departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9.  Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 10.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
          (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
          (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
     (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
     (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                       

JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR. 

THE WHITE HOUSE,
    June 8, 2021.

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Vučić: "If Kurti doesn't like it, he can try to do something. I wouldn't advise him"

SManalysis


The meeting between the President of the Republic of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, and the delegation of the Republic of Srpska ended.

SOURCE: B92 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2, 2021 | 12:50
 
The delegation from Banja Luka is led by the Chairman of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Milorad Dodik, and the President of the Republic of Srpska, Zeljka Cvijanovic.

The meeting was held in the building of the General Secretariat of the President of the Republic of Serbia.

In addition to Vučić, the meeting is also attended by the Prime Minister of Serbia, Ana Brnabić, as well as Ministers Nikola Selaković and Aleksandar Vulin.

After the meeting, the President of Serbia said that there were talks on important issues.

"These are not easy and simple days for the Serbian people. It seems that it is allowed to say anything against Serbia... Everyone is silent," Vucic said at the press conference.

"The fact is that (Albin) Kurti is blackmailing us, but I will treat him like any representative of temporary institutions. If he doesn't like it, he can try to do something. I wouldn't advise him," Vucic added.

Speaking about the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Vučić announced that according to the annex to the agreement, he will ask for daily reports and express his views and listen if RS has something to say about it.

After the meeting, Dodik said that the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia-Herzegovina should be abolished and pointed out that his party did not want to abolish the Dayton Agreement.

"We are not the anti-Dayton party in Bosnia-Herzegovina," he said.

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

"Recognition of Kosovo? I would be surprised"

SManalysis


US Special Representative for the Western Balkans Matthew Palmer said in Pristina that the best way to end the dialogue would be for Serbia to recognize Kosovo.

SOURCE: KOSOVO ONLINE WEDNESDAY, JUNE 2, 2021 | 07:02

However, US Balkan expert Daniel Serwer is pessimistic about mutual recognition.

Serwer told RTV "Dukagjini" that, although Biden administration took the job of dialogue more seriously, he does not expect recognition in the near future, reports Kosovo online.

"I don't think an agreement can be reached in the near future. I would be surprised if any other developments happen in the next meetings. I think the Biden administration is much more committed to recognizing Kosovo's independence and sovereignty within its current borders, but I doubt it will happen any time soon. It's best to ask Lajcak and Palmer. Some new arrangements are possible on things like missing people and finances, but I doubt there will be a recognition agreement," Serwer concluded.

Monday, May 31, 2021

Albanian parties against free transit of Serbs through North Macedonia

SManalysis


The Albanian parties Alliance for Albanians and Alternative in North Macedonia want to challenge the decision on free tolls for drivers from Serbia.

SOURCE: NOVOSTI MONDAY, MAY 31, 2021 | 08:40

Namely, Prime Minister Zoran Zaev made the decision to introduce relief for the citizens of Serbia during the summer season in gratitude for the donated contingents of vaccines against coronavirus infection, Belgrade media report.

The opposition Coalition of the Alliance for Albanians and Alternatives, as announced in Skopje, submitted an initiative to the Constitutional Court of North Macedonia to assess the legality of the Government's decision exempting Serbian citizens from paying tolls in transit through this country, Novosti reports.

The basis of the initiative submitted to the Constitutional Court lies in the allegations that the government's decision is contrary to the Law on Tolls, and at the same time, as it is claimed, puts the country's citizens, as well as foreign citizens from neighboring countries in transit through North Macedonia in an unequal position.

"By deciding to allocate 200.000 toll exemption cards for tourists from Serbia, the government discriminates against all other neighbors from which the country also benefits, through cooperation and good neighborly relations. The Ministry of Finance will spend almost three million euros on these cards, money from our fellow citizens, which came as a consequence of the inability of the Government and the Ministry of Health to provide vaccines against COVID-19", the Albanian opposition parties said in a statement, calling on the Skopje administration to change the decision.

As a sign of gratitude to Serbia for the donated vaccines against coronavirus, the Government of North Macedonia decided on May 25 that Serbian tourists in transit through this country be exempted from paying tolls in the period from June 15 to August 15, 2021.

The information of the Public Company for State Roads and the Ministry of Transport and Communications on the preparation of 200.000 electronic cards "M-smart card" for passenger motor vehicles of tourists from Serbia in transit on Corridor 10 during the summer season was adopted.

Friday, May 28, 2021

Serbian Patriarch Porfirije is surprised, worried and regrets Krivokapic's decision

SManalysis



Serbian Orthodox Church made a statement regarding the meeting between Montenegrin Prime Minister Zdravko Krivokapic and Patriarch Porfirije on Thursday.

SOURCE: B92 FRIDAY, MAY 28, 2021 | 11:00

According to the statement, the topic of conversation was the Basic Agreement between the Serbian Orthodox Church and the Government of Montenegro. The meeting was also attended by Metropolitan Chrysostom of Dabar-Bosnia, Bishop Jovan of Šumadija and Bishop Joanikije of the eparchy of Budimlja-Nikšić.

"In the morning of the same day, representatives of the Holy Synod of Bishops and the Government of the Republic of Montenegro fully agreed on the text of the Basic Agreement between the Serbian Orthodox Church and the state of Montenegro. Representatives of the Government of Podgorica then confirmed that Mr. Krivokapić will arrive to Belgrade in the afternoon to solemnly sign the Basic Agreement with His Holiness the Serbian Patriarch Porfirije.

After several hours of delay and informing the head of the Serbian Church about a number of completely different reasons for the delay in departure from Podgorica, Krivokapić arrived at the agreed meeting at around 9 p.m. The Prime Minister of the Government in Podgorica presented new and so far unspoken reasons why he believes that the signing of the Agreement must be postponed", the statement reads.

The Serbian Orthodox Church issued a statement after the meeting, stating that the Patriarch "patiently listened to the new reasons and was surprised and did not see any reason or justification for Prime Minister Krivokapic’s intention not to sign the Agreement, which was the only reason for his arrival at the Patriarchal Palace in Belgrade".

"His Holiness and the bishops expressed concern for the position of the Serbian Orthodox Church and its faithful as the only church that did has not signed an agreement to guarantee its legal position, which is an act of open discrimination. The SPC and its faithful will not give up on the defense of its rights and holy sites", the statement said.

In the meantime, the Prime Minister of Montenegro, Zdravko Krivokapić, also issued a statement.

Pomaks declare Turkish FM Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu persona non grata: “YOU ARE UNWANTED!”

SManalysis


by PAUL ANTONOPOULOS

The reactions of Pomaks (Slavic-speaking Muslims in Greece’s Western Thrace region) against their labelling as “Turks” by Turkey continues in view of the forthcoming visit of Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu on Sunday.

After the Cultural Association of Pomaks of Xanthi, which emphasised that “we are Pomaks and Greek citizens, not Turkish,” an announcement was issued by the Panhellenic Association of Pomaks.

In fact, the statement was so harsh that they declared Çavuşoğlu a “persona non grata” (ie. not welcome) to the Pomak villages of Xanthi.

An announced by the president of the Association, Imam Ahmed, states, as reported by Foni Rodopis:

“Mr. Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, YOU ARE UNWANTED!

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Mr. Mevlüt Çavuşoğl, expressing the history of our proud people, the voice of the free Pomaks, the memory of our girls who were crushed by the dozens of mountain peaks of the Rhodope Mountains and the Ottoman conquerors, the conscience of Pomak activists who in recent decades, have faced racist violence, beatings, threats, social and economic exclusion from paid representatives of your country’s nationalism, supporters of fascism/terrorism: YOU ARE UNDESIRABLE IN POMAKOCHORIA [A collection of Pomak villagers].

THE ONLY REASON FOR WHICH YOU SHOULD VISIT OUR HEROIC VILLAGES, WOULD BE TO ASK FOR A DEEP AND SINCERE APOLOGY FOR WHAT YOU HAVE DONE.

The democratic and civilized country of Australia established MAY 26 as a DAY OF NATIONAL APOLOGY for the atrocities committed by the colonial ancestors of today’s Australians against the aboriginal inhabitants.

It is a great opportunity to enter the realm of civilized countries, following the example of Australia, asking us Indigenous Thracians, for FORGIVENESS!

Otherwise, you are UNWANTED in Pomakochoria, you are a PERSONA NON GRATA!

Instead of the Pomak villages, we recommend you visit the blood-stained villages of the Kurds of Turkey and Syria, visiting the graves of the hundreds of thousands of murdered citizens, but also the democratic journalists and politicians of Turkey, who are rotting in your state prisons, and whose children and grandchildren you killed as well as all those who persecute the regime of your country en masse and by any means.”

Turkey repeatedly claims that the 120,000-strong Muslim minority in Greece’s Thrace are “Turkish,” despite the fact that Turkish-speakers make up a minority of the group who overwhelmingly identify as Greek, Pomak or Roma.

Turkey’s own Foreign Ministry website affirms that there is only officially a Muslim minority in Western Thrace via the Treaty of Lausanne Part VI Article 2, that states:

“Moslems established in the region to the east of the frontier line laid down in 1918 by the Treaty of Bucharest shall be considered as Moslem inhabitants of Western Thrace.”

Thursday, May 27, 2021

The "Kulti" plan was launched, Pristina sends the police in front of the monasteries

SManalysis


Kosovo police registered growing number of attacks on the property of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Kosovo and Metohija, police patrols on the ground tightened

SOURCE: KOSOVO ONLINE THURSDAY, MAY 27, 2021 | 12:14

Since the start of this year alone, a total of 13 damages to church property or attempted theft have been recorded.

"As of today, a total of 13 cases have been reported at Serbian Orthodox Church's facilities in different regions of Kosovo. Out of the total number of reported cases, 9 are classified as cases of aggravated theft and 4 as property damage," the Kosovo Police said to Kosovo online.

The police state that, in accordance with their competencies, they recorded and partially prosecuted the perpetrators of criminal acts.

"After the cases were reported, the competent police units went to the scene, conducted investigations and collected material evidence, which was presented to the competent prosecutor's office and further investigative actions were coordinated. In certain cases, the perpetrators have been identified and charges have been filed against them, and other cases are still being investigated", they added in a statement. In order to prevent attacks on the facilities of the Serbian Orthodox Church, the Kosovo Police is implementing a special operational action plan.

"After the growing number of reported cases in March 2021, the Kosovo Police launched an additional operational plan 'Kulti' which is implemented throughout Kosovo, involving a number of police units with the aim of preventive action and detection of perpetrators," it is concluded in the statement of the Kosovo Police. 

Σερβία: παρακαλούμε την Ελλάδα να μην αναγνωρίσει το Κοσσυφοπέδιο

SManalysis

Ταχείες εξελίξεις στα Βαλκάνια. Μετά τις τεταμένες σχέσεις μεταξύ Ελλάδας και Τουρκίας, ανοίγει μια άλλη πληγή στις σχέσεις των Ορθόδοξων κρατών στα Βαλκάνια. Η Ελλάδα ετοιμάζεται να αναγνωρίσει το Κοσσυφοπέδιο! Αυτός ο ισχυρισμός είναι παράδοξος αν το θεωρήσουμε από το 1993, όταν ο πρώην πρωθυπουργός της Ελλάδας, ο Κωσταντίνος Μητσοτάκη, δήλωσε 6 καυτά σημεία για την επίλυση του ζητήματος της Βόρειας Ηπείρου, προς την Αλβανία, αναφέροντας το τελεσίγραφο ότι: "Ό, τι θέλουν οι Αλβανοί του Κοσσυφοπεδίου για αυτοδιάθεση, αυτό ζητούν οι Έλληνες στη Βόρεια Ήπειρο ". αλλά τα πράγματα έχουν αλλάξει και η Ελλάδα φαίνεται να έχει σβήσει αυτόν τον ιστορικό ισχυρισμό εθνικών υποθέσεων. Αυτό θα είναι ντροπή για την ελληνική διπλωματία.


Πιστεύω στη φιλία του Βελιγραδίου με την Αθήνα, λέει ο Πρόεδρος Βούτσης.

27 Μαΐου 2021 

Ο Πρόεδρος της Σερβίας Αλεξάνταρ Βούτσιτς δήλωσε σήμερα ότι έλαβε επίσημη ανακοίνωση ότι η Ελλάδα προτίθεται να βελτιώσει τις σχέσεις της με το Κοσσυφοπέδιο. Είπε ότι πιστεύει στη φιλία του Βελιγραδίου με την Αθήνα και ότι η Ελλάδα δεν θα προχωρήσει ένα βήμα παραπέρα για να αναγνωρίσει την ανεξαρτησία του Κοσσυφοπεδίου.

Σε δήλωση τύπου μετά από συνάντηση με τον πατριάρχη και τους επισκόπους της Σερβικής Ορθόδοξης Εκκλησίας, μέλη του Συμβουλίου Επισκόπων, ο Βούτσιτς δήλωσε ότι όταν το Κοσσυφοπέδιο επέβαλε φόρο στα σερβικά αγαθά, η Ελλάδα της έδωσε την ευκαιρία να ανοίξει εμπορικά γραφεία, και τώρα αυτή η έκθεση έχει φτάσει σε υψηλότερο επίπεδο.

"Την Παρασκευή, ενημερώσαμε επίσημα ότι η Ελλάδα θα βελτιώσει τις σχέσεις της με την Πρίστινα σε υψηλότερο επίπεδο, πολιτικούς διευθυντές, ο οποίος είναι το υψηλότερο δυνατό άτομο σε επίπεδο υπουργείου", εξήγησε.

Ο Βούτσιτς είπε ότι θα παρακαλέσει την Ελλάδα να μην το επιτρέψει αυτό, διότι το επόμενο βήμα θα ήταν η αναγνώριση της ανεξαρτησίας του Κοσσυφοπεδίου. Σύμφωνα με τον ίδιο, πρόκειται για πρόβλημα, διότι δείχνει ότι όχι μόνο η Ευρώπη μπορεί να ενωθεί ενάντια στη Σερβία για το ζήτημα του Κοσσυφοπεδίου.

Τόνισε ότι υπάρχει ένας επιπλέον κίνδυνος πίεσης σε άλλες χώρες να κάνουν το ίδιο.
Στη συνέχεια, λέει, θα επιτευχθούν διμερείς συμφωνίες, όπου μια τρίτη χώρα θα εκπροσωπεί το Κοσσυφοπέδιο σε διεθνείς οργανισμούς και έτσι θα γίνει μέρος του ΝΑΤΟ.

"Η κατάσταση είναι πολύ δύσκολη για εμάς. "Προσκαλέσαμε τον Έλληνα πρέσβη για μια συνομιλία, αλλά δεν λάβαμε τίποτα, επειδή έχουμε πίστη στη φιλία και ελπίζουμε ότι δεν θα πάει σε περαιτέρω μέτρα και προσεγγίσεις", τόνισε ο Βούτσι ..

Ερωτηθείς εάν έχει λάβει εγγυήσεις ότι η Ελλάδα δεν θα αναγνωρίσει το Κοσσυφοπέδιο, είπε ότι έχει λάβει τέτοιες εγγυήσεις καθημερινά, αλλά ότι τα γεγονότα δείχνουν ότι αυξάνουν το επίπεδο των σχέσεών τους με το Κοσσυφοπέδιο.

"Την επόμενη περίοδο, περιμένω περισσότερες επισκέψεις στο Βελιγράδι και ό, τι θα λειτουργήσει θα είναι πίεση. Θα υπάρξουν επίσης προσπάθειες για τη διασφάλιση της ανεξαρτησίας του Κοσσυφοπεδίου μέσω περιφερειακών πρωτοβουλιών. "Θα προσφέρει κάποιες λύσεις που φαίνονται καλές με την πρώτη ματιά, αλλά πίσω από αυτό είναι de facto αναγνώριση", δήλωσε ο Σέρβος πρόεδρος.

Ο Βούτσιτς κατέληξε στο συμπέρασμα ότι η Σερβία αντιμετωπίζει μια πολύ δύσκολη πολιτική περίοδο. Ακόμα και χθες, ο Βούτσιτς μίλησε για τις σχέσεις του Κοσσυφοπεδίου με την Ελλάδα, εκφράζοντας την ανησυχία του ότι αλλάζουν σημαντικά στον διπλωματικό τομέα. 

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Balkan money-laundering is booming

SManalysis


The property market makes a good place to hide ill-gotten gains | Europe

5/23/2021 12:20:00 PM

Last week prosecutors in North Macedonia charged Nikola Gruevski, the former prime minister, with money-laundering

The property market makes a good place to hide ill-gotten gains | Europe

.Across the Balkans dirty money is being laundered through property, distorting the market and inflating prices—much to the rage of ordinary house-hunters. Swanky new towers are rising in Tirana, Pristina and Belgrade. Although Balkan economies have been hit hard by covid-19, property prices in parts of the region have defied gravity. In Tirana they have more than doubled since 2017. Across Albania, the value of real-estate transactions rose by 6.7% in 2020.

The laundering of drug money, especially from cocaine trafficking, which has boomed in the past few years, is one reason why prices are rising, finds a new report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime, an international network of crime specialists. Another is that crooked officials need to invest their cash. All Balkan countries have sound money-laundering laws, but enforcement is patchy.

In the past decade Balkan crime syndicates have outgrown their small home countries. They now make much of their money abroad. Hence, says the report, a hefty share of their profits is invested abroad, too. But they still invest at home. Fatjona Mejdini, who helped research the report, says that Balkan governments are ambivalent about money-laundering. They want to crack down on it but simultaneously welcome the jobs and investment it can bring. As for the gangsters, murderous in making money, they are conservative when it comes to investing it. They “lack imagination” says Ms Mejdini, which is why they prefer bricks and mortar to the many other types of business they could use to launder their loot. headtopics.com